<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The HyperBlogCafe &#187; Judge Napolitano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/tag/judge-napolitano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why War Is The Death Of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-war-is-the-death-of-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-war-is-the-death-of-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the below monologue, by Judge Andrew Napolitano, he makes a brilliant case against non-defensive, and unnecessary wars. And, how war equals the growth of Central Governments, and the death of Personal Liberty: Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com ‎&#8221;War is the death of freedom because war is the health of Big Government.&#8221; - Judge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In the below monologue, by Judge Andrew Napolitano, he makes a brilliant case against non-defensive, and unnecessary wars. And, how war equals the growth of Central Governments, and the death of Personal Liberty: </em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/embed.js?id=1269071638001&#038;w=466&#038;h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com">video.foxbusiness.com</a></noscript></p>
<p><em>‎&#8221;War is the death of freedom because war is the health of Big Government.&#8221;<br />
- Judge Andrew Napolitano</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<em>And, <a href="http://lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano28.1.html" target="_blank">here</a> is the text to the above (video) monologue.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-war-is-the-death-of-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Social Security Is Worse Than A Ponzi Scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-social-security-is-worse-than-a-ponzi-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-social-security-is-worse-than-a-ponzi-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is great monologue by Judge Andrew Napolitano, explaining why our Social Security system is worse then a Ponzi Scheme: Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Below is great monologue by Judge Andrew Napolitano, explaining why our Social Security system is worse then a Ponzi Scheme:</em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/embed.js?id=1160119391001&#038;w=466&#038;h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com">video.foxbusiness.com</a></noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-social-security-is-worse-than-a-ponzi-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bread And Circuses And The Roman Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/bread-and-circuses-and-the-roman-empire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/bread-and-circuses-and-the-roman-empire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Bread and Circuses&#8221; (or bread and games) (from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metaphor for a superficial means of appeasement. In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the creation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through the mere satisfaction of the immediate, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Bread and Circuses&#8221; (or bread and games) (from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metaphor for a superficial means of appeasement. In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the creation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow requirements of a populace. The phrase also implies the erosion or ignorance of civic duty amongst the concerns of the common man (l&#8217;homme moyen sensuel).&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;In modern usage, the phrase has become an adjective to describe a populace that no longer values civic virtues and the public life. To many across the political spectrum, left and right, it connotes the triviality and frivolity that characterized the Roman Empire prior to its decline.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;This phrase originates from Rome in Satire X of the Roman poet Juvenal (circa 100 AD ). In context, the Latin phrase panem et circenses (bread and circuses) identifies the only remaining cares of a Roman populace which has given up its birthright of political involvement. Here Juvenal displays his contempt for the declining heroism of his contemporary Romans. Roman politicians devised a plan in 140 B.C. to win the votes of the poor: giving out cheap food and entertainment, &#8220;bread and circuses&#8221;, would be the most effective way to rise to power.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p style="display: inline !important;"><em>&#8220;Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions — everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses.&#8221; &#8211; Juvenal (Satire 10.77–81)</em></p>
<p><em>&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses" target="_blank">Wikipedia.org</a></em></p>
<p><meta name="description" content="This is a post for Bread and Circuses " /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/bread-and-circuses-and-the-roman-empire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Break Down In Personal Responsibility</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-break-down-in-personal-responsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-break-down-in-personal-responsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=14948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is Judge Napolitano, on Apr 20, 2011, eloquently, breaking down, the break down in personal responsibility, and our Federal Government&#8217;s efforts to diminish our individuality. He also discusses the sets of values that factions both on the left and right, historically, through The Federal Government, have been pushing on the entire country. This is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Below is Judge Napolitano, on Apr 20, 2011, eloquently, breaking down, the break down in personal responsibility, and our Federal Government&#8217;s efforts to diminish our individuality. He also discusses the sets of values that factions both on the left and right, historically, through The Federal Government, have been pushing on the entire country.</em></p>
<p><em>This is a great monologue!</em></p>
<p><em>Enjoy!</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<script src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/embed.js?id=4655466&amp;w=466&amp;h=263" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com" rel="nofollow">video.foxbusiness.com</a></noscript><br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-break-down-in-personal-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Permanent Factions Are A Fallacy</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-permanent-factions-are-a-fallacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-permanent-factions-are-a-fallacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=14681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In George Washington&#8217;s Farewell Address &#8211; among the many insightful topics that he covered, his warning of the dangers of forming political parties, in our country, were, perhaps, his most brilliant words of all. I&#8217;m sure there are many definitions of faction; but, when I think of political factions, I think of it as any like-minded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In George Washington&#8217;s Farewell Address &#8211; among the many insightful topics that he covered, his <a href="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/george-washington-on-the-danger-of-political-parties/" target="_blank">warning of the dangers of forming political parties</a>, in our country, were, perhaps, his most brilliant words of all.</em></p>
<p><em>I&#8217;m sure there are many definitions of faction; but, when I think of political factions, I think of it as any like-minded group of voters, or elected officials, trying to infiltrate, or influence, our Government, laws, Constitution etc.</em></p>
<p><em>As George Washington, astutely, pointed out, the formation of factions, and allegiances, among several like-minded individuals, is, indeed, consistent with human-nature. However, in my humble opinion, they also defy human-nature. For example, we are individuals; and, as individuals, we don&#8217;t generally appreciate being controlled, or told to walk lockstep with a certain ideology; yet, we see this in so many facets of our lives, and political system -</em><em><span id="more-14681"></span></em></p>
<p><em>For example, there are labor unions, who bond together, and influence political outcomes, in order to advance their agendas. However, the presumption is, that the labor union bosses can take dues, paid by individuals, and throw them into a political party &#8211; regardless if a particular member belongs to that party or not. Therefore, in the name of job security, perhaps, some are willing to sell out some other values, and walk lockstep with the demands of these labor union bosses, but, I, and I&#8217;m sure, others, would not be able to do so.</em></p>
<p><em>Then, there is, perhaps, the two most powerful unions of all &#8211; they are called The Democrat and Republican Parties. For years, we have been led to believe that these two parties are our Government; and, if we don&#8217;t vote for one of these two parties, then our voice has very little chance of being heard. While there may be some truth to that, I still believe, that, if a vast majority of the American population registered to Independents, then we would be a nation of individual voters, again, and not a nation of Republicans and Democrats, being led by the party platform of the day.</em></p>
<p><em>The truth is, when our Constitution was written, political parties were not even anticipated in The Constitutional Convention, and, therefore, we had a Constitution that presumed that we would have one political body, in Congress, and a nation of independent Americans &#8211; who would elect those who best represented their views. And, over the last few years &#8211; as many Americans have become acutely aware of, neither party really pays attention to the 17 specific, limited, and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#a1_sec8" target="_blank"><em>Enumerated Powers</em></a>, that were given to Congress, by our Founders. Therefore, we are constitutionally electing our Government, but, as far as the laws passed, and the powers assumed, we most certainly do not have The Federal Government that our Founders envisioned; and, which was promised to our nation, by our Founders.</em></p>
<div><em>If there were a way to return to the original intents of our Founders, I have no doubt, that, within those 17 Enumerated Powers, we would have plenty of room for different points of view, and opinions. Speaking for myself, I don&#8217;t agree, fully, with either The Democrat or Republican Parties. For example, there are some in The Democrat Party who believe, we should only go to war when we are attacked, or in eminent danger of an attack &#8211; I happen to fully agree with that. And, conversely, most Republicans have a free-market view of economics, which I also agree with. If you were to take both of these views, you would find that, both are totally consistent with the original intents of our Constitution; however, those views are split into different (factions) parties, and, are not consistent with all members of each party.</em></div>
<div><em> </em></div>
<div><em>These are but a few examples of why I have come to the conclusion that, factions and parties are merely a smoke-screen. They give a perception that they are acting in your best interest, but that is usually operating under the presumption that they always know what is in your best interest. I truly believe that, our Constitution was created for a nation of independent &#8216;individuals;&#8217;  while parties, when formed, treated people with a &#8216;collectivist&#8217; mentality, in order to further and advance ideologies outside of the scope of our Founders&#8217; original intentions.</em></div>
<div><em> </em></div>
<div><em>Therefore, in my humble opinion, while it may be natural for people to create factions, I truly believe, that, &#8216;temporary&#8217; factions, made up of interested individuals, in order to advance a specific agenda, or piece of legislation, is much more practical; and, consistent with human-nature.</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-permanent-factions-are-a-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Third Rail Of Politics Is Becoming The First</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-third-rail-of-politics-is-becoming-the-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-third-rail-of-politics-is-becoming-the-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=14297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this very unfortunate time, in our country&#8217;s history, we have come to a point, economically, where we are faced with some very daunting choices&#8230; Naturally, and understandably, there are things, that, as a nation, we have come to expect from our Federal Government; whether they are wholly Constitutional, such as having a military to defend our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In this very unfortunate time, in our country&#8217;s history, we have come to a point, economically, where we are faced with some very daunting choices&#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>Naturally, and understandably, there are things, that, as a nation, we have come to expect from our Federal Government; whether they are wholly Constitutional, such as having a military to defend our nation; or were created without explicit Constitutional authority, as with Medicare and Social Security, these three things, among others, are often referred to as sacred cows. They are referred to as such, because, while t</em><em>he majority of Americans appear to be realizing that we do, indeed, need to make some tough fiscal choices, in regards to Government-spending - generally-speaking, it is always some one else&#8217;s programs, or sacred cows, that, when asked, should be the first to be cut, or eliminated.</em>  <em>I suppose that should be of no surprise, as it is a very part of our human-nature to not want to be forced into making potential, life-altering decisions.</em></p>
<p><em>Irregardless, according to most professionals, these are the three items, in our Federal budget, that seem to be placing our Federal Government, and country, in very serious danger of  going broke. Therefore, in my humble opinion, all programs, and all agencies, in the Federal Government, must be put on the table; and every American, who really wants to see our country be passed onto future generations, as a free and prosperous nation, must be willing to make some difficult choices.</em></p>
<p><em>Most, if not all, Americans, would agree, a military is absolutely critical to our security; and, like it or not, millions have become dependent on Medicare and Social Security. For these reasons alone, these three items, in our country, are classified as the third rail of politics; simply, because, they are very hot things to touch, politically. And, generally-speaking, only the most honest of politicians will give us the truth, in regards to the sovereignty, and longevity, of these three items.</em><em> </em></p>
<p><em>While some, in our Federal Government, including our President, have publicly acknowledged that Medicare, then Social Security, are the two Government programs, that, if unchanged, will put our nation most at risk, few are putting fourth any serious legislation that would deal with any of the these increasing monstrosities.</em></p>
<p><em>I don&#8217;t have all the numbers, and I am not an economist, but one idea I have heard, and really liked, was to block grant Medicare and Social Security down to the respective states, and let the states manage them, and decide their fates, going forward. That would not only be a great step, Constitutionally, in regards to states&#8217; rights, but it would also allow our Federal Government to get back to the few things that they were initially created for, by our Founders; while, getting their own fiscal house in order!</em><em><span id="more-14297"></span></em></p>
<p><em>In regards to our military:</em></p>
<p><em>I have the highest respect, and admiration, for all military men, and women, who have served, and are serving, our nation. I would &#8220;never&#8221; want to see them go without proper equipment to keep them safe, or to accomplish their missions. However, perhaps it is time, as a nation, for us to honestly ask, what exactly is the overall goal for our military? Is the goal to protect our 50 states? Or, several countries? Who may have needed our help, for some time, after World War 2 - but, after 65 years, should be well-prepared to defend their own nations! Is our goal to track down terrorists, who want to do our country harm? Or, is it to build nations, and create Governments? Where such Governments may never even be accepted! And, no matter how much money we throw at Governments, and countries &#8211; without a free-market system of economics, most under-developed countries will, likely, never rise out of poverty.</em></p>
<p><em>These are the questions that we, as a nation, need to be asking ourselves, and discussing, openly, with fellow-citizens. There are certainly no easy answers; but, if we act sooner, rather then later, the results will be less painful and more rational. If we all step up, and honestly ask, where would I take a cut? And, how much of a cut am I willing to take? We can begin the process of resetting, and getting our country back on the track that made us a powerful, free, and prosperous, nation, in the first place.</em></p>
<p><em>The result of doing nothing, could mean, no longer being able to pay for Medicare, Social Security, and a number of other Federal Government programs. And, could you imagine a time to where we can no longer afford any military, whatsoever? God help us!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-third-rail-of-politics-is-becoming-the-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Gave Congress Ownership Of Our Speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/who-gave-congress-ownership-of-our-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/who-gave-congress-ownership-of-our-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=14150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most Americans are aware of, The First Amendment of The United States Constitution, contains these words: &#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As most Americans are aware of, The </em><a href="http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#amdt_1_(1791)" target="_blank"><em>First Amendment</em></a><em> of The United States Constitution, contains these words:</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&#8221;</em> </p>
<p><em>As Americans, we should be outraged by the horrific, and tragic, shootings, that took place, last weekend, in Tuscon, Arizona. And, we should all want our Representatives, and all members of Congress, to feel secure, when they are out seeing their constituents. However, even more frightening, in light of this tragedy, is some members of Congress, who think they have some right of ownership over our speech, and political discourse, are talking about creating new laws that would regulate certain types of political discourse in America! That would not only be outrageous, but very misguided, and very un-Constitutional! </em> </p>
<p><em>Everyday, I hear political discourse, and often from Congress themselves, that is infuriating, and divisive! However, I would never, in a 1000 years, go out and harm another person, simply because I don&#8217;t like what they are saying!</em> </p>
<p><em>Consider this:</em></p>
<p><em>So often, in the last two years, we hear members of The Democrat Party, in Congress, and The President, himself, perpetually bash rich people, and perpetuate this class-warfare, divisive, rhetoric. Now, God-forbid, if a poor person were to go out and start gunning down millionaires, can we call for a Federal investigation of members of Congress, for antagonizing murder? Of course not! Even the thought of it is ridiculous!</em></p>
<p><em>And, if Congress were given the ability to regulate speech, where would it end? And, how long would it be before they start regulating our religious freedoms? As our Founders, wisely, knew: such powers, in the hands of a central government, would undoubtedly become arbitrary, and inevitably, despotic! In fact, in countries where the Freedoms of Speech are suppressed, it is very likely that the bigger guns do prevail! Our Freedom of Speech, and free elections, are absolutely necessary for free people to vent their frustrations, and discontent, with their government; which, ultimately, prevents a free nation from digressing into a chaotic, and despotic, state! </em><em><span id="more-14150"></span></em></p>
<p><em>These over-reactionary, law-makers, often, don&#8217;t seem to be able to separate prudent governance from political activism!  And, as long as that is the case, it is left to We, The People, to </em><em>force these over-zealous, opportunist, law-makers, to remain </em><em>within the confounds of their Enumerated Powers, as enumerated in our Federal Constitution!</em></p>
<p><em>Rational people understand, that barring freak accidents, guns do not kill people &#8211; Just as matches, on their own, do not light fires!  </em><em>The only thing that kills people, are unstable, and unbalanced, individuals, who likely needed to be helped medically, before such a tragedy could occur! Therefore, instead of jumping to hyperbolic, and irrational, conclusions, in the future, perhaps, we, as an nation, should start examining the true roots of such problems!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/who-gave-congress-ownership-of-our-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is The United States Currency Counterfeit?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/is-the-united-states-currency-counterfeit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/is-the-united-states-currency-counterfeit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 04:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=13182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During The Revolutionary War, The Continental Congress issued approximately $240 million in paper money, called Continentals. The understanding was that, after the war, this money could be redeemed in gold or silver. The states, thinking this was a great way to create money, also began printing money. On top of that, The British created counterfeit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<address>During The Revolutionary War, The Continental Congress issued approximately $240 million in paper money, called Continentals. The understanding was that, after the war, this money could be redeemed in gold or silver. The states, thinking this was a great way to create money, also began printing money. On top of that, The British created counterfeit Continentals, and used them to buy supplies from The Americans. </address>
<address> </address>
<address>With the weak Articles of Confederation, and the printing of these bills, The United States nearly lost the war for independence. And, not too long after, confidence in these Continentals had gotten so low, that by 1780, each bill was barely worth one cent. </address>
<address> </address>
<address>Even though God&#8217;s grace was with our country, and the war for independence was won - due to this practice of printing money, the newly formed United States suffered a period of real financial depression. It was so bad that foreign nations were hovering over us, like vultures, waiting for the new United States to collapse.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>Fortunately, God&#8217;s grace was still upon our new country, and James Madison, along with George Washington, formed what we now know as The Philadelphia Convention, where our Constitution was written, and a true miracle took place. That document, and the subsequent ratification, by the states, transformed The new United States from a country near collapse, to a prosperous, and free Republic.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>The framers of our Constitution, now knowing the evils of printing paper (fiat) money, which is not based, firmly, on a tangible asset, decided against the usage of any fiat money for the currency of The United States, and elected only to use gold and silver coinage for our currency.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>This wisdom was enshrined in <a href="http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#a1_sec8" target="_blank">Article 1, Section 8</a>, Clause 5, of The United States Constitution; which grants these powers, explicitly, to The United States Congress:</address>
<address> </address>
<address><span id="more-13182"></span></address>
<address> • To &#8220;coin Money,&#8221; regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;</address>
<address> </address>
<address>Our founders were so serious about having sound money, that Congress was also given the power to punish any counterfeiting, or debasing, of United States currency:</address>
<address> </address>
<address><a href="http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#a1_sec8" target="_blank">Article 1, Section 8</a>, Clause 6:</address>
<address>• To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;</address>
<address> </address>
<address>In fact, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1792" target="_blank">The Coinage Act of 1792</a>, Congress even prescribed the death penalty to anyone who counterfeited or deliberately debased our currency.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>Beyond that, <a href="http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#a1_sec10" target="_blank">Article 1, Section 10</a>, Clause 1, made it illegal for the states to except anything but gold and silver coins as a system of payment:</address>
<address> </address>
<address>• &#8221;No State shall&#8221; &#8230; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; &#8220;make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts&#8221;</address>
<address> </address>
<address>Today, The Federal Reserve (as opposed to Congress, as directed by our Constitution), not only directs the printing of paper (fiat) money, but they also set the monetary value of all United States currency.  Not only does Congress not do what it has been Constitutionally mandated to do, but Congress can not even audit The Federal Reserve! Therefore, unbelievably, our own &#8220;elected&#8221; officials can not even see what is going on with OUR monetary policies.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>Beyond that, all 50 states, and beyond, are distributing the very currency that our Constitution prohibited from ever being created and distributed in the first place.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>Therefore, our entire currency system is not only being created by an un-Constitutional agency, that can not be audited, but the states are, unknowingly, or complicitly, allowing this currency to be distributed! However, as we have seen in Article 1, Section 10, the states are not allowed, Constitutionally, to coin their own money - which doesn&#8217;t leave the individual states with very many options.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>At some point, the very thing that our founders learned, and warned us against, with regards to fiat money, is the very thing that could be leading The United States, today, into another horrible - financial crisis.</address>
<address> </address>
<address>God help us ALL!</address>
<address> </address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/is-the-united-states-currency-counterfeit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libertarian Versus Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/libertarian-versus-conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/libertarian-versus-conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=11936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 12, 2010, Judge Andrew Napolitano launched his new show, Freedom Watch, on The Fox Business Network. On this show, I really appreciated this (below) discussion between The Judge, Congressman Ron Paul (Libertarian), and Sarah Palin (Conservative). I happen to really admire The Judge, Congressman Paul, and Sarah Palin, for their beliefs in our founding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>On June 12, 2010, Judge Andrew Napolitano launched his new show, Freedom Watch, on The Fox Business Network. On this show, I really appreciated this (below) discussion between The Judge, Congressman Ron Paul (Libertarian), and Sarah Palin (Conservative). I happen to really admire The Judge, Congressman Paul, and Sarah Palin, for their beliefs in our founding values, and our Constitution, as written, and understood, by our founders. </em></p>
<p><em>Due to the increasing size and scope of our Federal Government, and the increasing far-left agendas of The Obama Administration, there is no doubt, that even people who previously identified themselves as Conservatives, have increasingly moved further right, to a more Libertarian point of view. It is doubtful that our country could ever go back to a completely Libertarian state, as in the days of our founders, but it is great to see such a Constitutional awakening in our country, and a desire to move closer and closer to our founding values, and The Constitutional principles that made us such a great country, for so many years.</em></p>
<p><em>I have often said, &#8220;<a href="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/if-a-plant-loses-its-roots" target="_blank">if a plant loses it&#8217;s roots</a>,&#8221; then the plant could never survive. Conversely, if a country is too far removed from it&#8217;s foundation, then God only knows where it could lead. Sadly, the many problems that we are currently experiencing in The United States, is greatly due to the lack of prudence to our Constitution, by our Federal Government, over the last 100 or so years.</em></p>
<p><em>Please listen to this insightful and informative discussion:</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="270" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aNxJZJGzcOQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="270" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aNxJZJGzcOQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object><br />
&#8211;</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://freedomwatchonfox.com/"><img src="http://freedomwatchonfox.com/img/freedomwatch-badge-122x75.png" border="0" alt="Watch Freedom Watch" width="120" height="75" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/libertarian-versus-conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck&#8217;s Pop Political Quiz</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/glenn-becks-pop-political-quiz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/glenn-becks-pop-political-quiz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=10836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this episode of Glenn Beck, with a live studio audience, Glenn does a historical review of the different political philosophies in The United States&#8230; Through various Constitutional questions, and explanations by Judge Andrew Napolitano, they help the audience, and viewers, begin to guage where they fall, in the political spectrum, in United States&#8217; politics. The entire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>On this episode of Glenn Beck, with a live studio audience, Glenn does a historical review of the different political philosophies in The United States&#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>Through various Constitutional questions, and explanations by Judge Andrew Napolitano, they help the audience, and viewers, begin to guage where they fall, in the political spectrum, in United States&#8217; politics.</em></p>
<p><em>The entire show is very interesting, educational, and certainly worth watching&#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>Enjoy!</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<script src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4056197&amp;w=400&amp;h=249" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript></noscript><br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/glenn-becks-pop-political-quiz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

