Friday, January 22nd, 2010 | Author: KEB

Over the last century, our country, and countries across the globe, have made fantastic strides in providing infrastructure. Roads are built by governments; safe potable water is distributed in just about every town across America; refuse is collected and deposited in consolidated landfills; communication is transmitted instantly, worldwide, and electricity is delivered to every household in a modern civilization. This has provided a great deal of comfort in our daily lives.

Without so much as a thought, we can flip a switch, and turn on a light in a dark room, operate this fancy computer I get to use on a daily basis, and charge up the ipod, and all manner of portable appliances we have become dependent upon in our daily lives. When we are thirsty, or need to wash our clothes, the turn of a faucet handle will provide a seemingly unending supply of fresh water, and almost if by magic, the things we find no longer useful in our lives, can be put in the trash bin to go off to who knows where … but it isn’t here, and that is the important part … or is it?

When I began considering the massive integration and collective cooperation we have as a society, the geek in me began to see subtle flaws in its implementation; then the more I dwelt on the issue, the more important these flaws became, until I can no longer take anything for granted; danger, grave danger, lies everywhere, and we as a society are blind to its inherent flaws. Sure, I like a nice hot shower, probably more than most folks; to get that shower though, I have to rely upon lots of other people; people I don’t know, to do things that quite frankly, I don’t understand. The public works people maintain the public water supply, and actually keep the city’s waterline in proper working order; send off water samples for tests, treat waste water, and scope out new well sites among the vast number of other things they are required to do, to actually get water out of the ground, or reservoir, and out to the populous. The electrical workers have to maintain not only the power generation plant, but they also have to install and maintain tens of thousands of miles of high power electrical lines to get the power out to the customer. Power generation facilities across the continent are connected in very complex and highly volatile network, and require tens of thousands of people, on a daily basis, just to keep it working. Our trash is collected and consolidated into huge holes in the ground, designed to hide the excess of our ways. In essence, we just live our daily lives and use these things without a thought about any problem or potential problem that might exist in the system … and that is a very dangerous situation to be in.

Last week when the news broke, about the earthquake in Haiti, we were complacent … oh, another earthquake in a place most of us had never given a second thought to … but when the gravity of the disaster began to become real for us (thanks Anderson Cooper), we realized that this was much more than your run of the mill earthquake; if there even is such a thing. No, this was much worse, this was the complete collapse of an entire society of people; an entire country is in turmoil, and despair is the nicest thing they have going for them. This was devastation like we have never seen before. Outside of collapsed schools, homes, businesses, and government buildings, were throngs of people, hundreds of thousands of people, displaced. There are perhaps, 2 million people or more, whose daily lives are affected to a degree that we can barely fathom, yet here we sit oblivious to the dangers our own highly integrated society has built for itself; oblivious to the havoc we would face if we were to have our own infrastructure-quake.

Consider that you are reading this, likely on a computer, powered by electricity, generated by a power plant, that runs on uranium, coal, oil or gas. What happens when there is a failure at a power plant? Can’t happen? Think again … across this country, there have been numerous catastrophic plant failures, explosions at solar power facilities, core leaks at nuclear plants, massive turbine failures, collapse of steam pipes, and wind and ice damage to transmission lines … and that was only in the last couple of years. It doesn’t seem that bad though, particularly if you were not one of those affected, without power for weeks on end. As any computer expert would tell you, in order to have a secure and reliable system, you must have redundancy … lots of redundancy. Look at how NASA works … there are redundancy protocols, for redundant systems, for redundant protocols, for backup systems, for backup systems… and yet they still have a track record of having catastrophic, irrecoverable, problems.

That hot shower we take for granted, would be of little concern for those who rely upon a public water source, were that source to become contaminated or unavailable. Consider that, in a town my size, as many as 50,000 people could be left without so much as drinking water, much less bathing water, if a single system goes down. The idea that bigger is better, and consolidation for the common good, is of little concern if you are thirsty.

What we can learn here, is that, smaller, more localized handling of the needs of people will provide a much better solution than massive projects to provide for the masses. Multiple, neighborhood water supplies, will ensure that, in the event of a single failure, the least number of people are affected. If one or more wells stop functioning, there may be a lower capacity of the remaining supplies, but the lower supply is a better alternative than no supply. Electricity generation is another very similar situation… If we have more plants, much smaller than the gazillion megawatt plants of today, spread out in more communities, with shorter transmission distances, the failure of one in a huge network, will be much less problematic than the failure of a single plant providing power to an entire quadrant of the country.

The whole point is, when you put all of your proverbial eggs into a single basket, no matter how big and strong that basket might be, there is a flaw in that basket, a flaw you don’t see … and grandma knew that… thats why she always carried two baskets to the hen house, and why she went twice a day. If one of the baskets failed, she didn’t lose all of the eggs. As a populace, it would do us well to remember that … we need to have many baskets in order to have the least collateral damage in the event one fails. If you learn nothing from the plight of the Haitians, learn this one thing … almost always, a little something is better than no something … and right now, the basket that contained the Haitian infrastructure, has been dropped to the ground by an earthquake nobody predicted.

For those interested, please consider making a donation to a cause that will truly benefit the Haitian people. A dear friend of mine, has setup a tax deductible charity that accepts donations. These donations will be used to provide food, water and shelter, for the people of Haiti. Please give as your conscience leads.
  • Share/Bookmark
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses

  1. I used to never think about doing without water, electricity, and sewage until I read Terri Blackstock’s restoration series

    All electricity, computers, water plants, etc are destroyed due to electro-magnetic pulses from a star that exploded in space. The “what-if” books do a good job showing the chaos that such a catastrophe would cause.

  2. Jackie,
    That book series looks really interesting. Thank you!

  3. Good job! In great detail, you articulated the many complexities of our system, that we simply do take for granted, on a daily basis…

    One thing you did not mention, was the potential vulnerability of cyber-attacks/cyber-terrorism, aimed at our power grids etc. While technology is a splendid thing, it also makes us increasingly more vulnerable.

    Haiti is, indeed, a major disaster of cataclysmic proportions; and unlike The U.S., their infrastructure was a disaster waiting to happen. In comparison, on smaller scale, I suppose we could look at the breach of our aging levees when Katrina hit; displacing many people, and causing social chaos for quite some time.

    911 was another event that clearly pointed out how The U.S., with all of our technology and capabilities, is always very vulnerable, if our guard is let down in key elements, such as intelligence gathering and national-security.

    Lastly, I have also been thinking about collective societies as well, over the last year, with the near financial collapse of ‘08. Indeed, there are some very astute survivalists out there, who are prepared for a near, or complete breakdown of our system. And there are scores of people who have invested in tangible assets, such as gold, to at least guard against a hyper-inflation scenario. It makes you wonder how much more vulnerable we are, if our own government continues on this reckless path of spending. Short of foreign invaders, or natural catastrophes, we could very well fall on our own sword, through lose fiscal policies, and/or a complete social breakdown. At which point, foreign invaders very well could come in for the kill.

    None of these thoughts are very pleasant, but after 911, if we learned anything, it is that we are not as insulated as we may have once believed.

  4. Speaking of redundancy:
    I would love to see another system of currency, or way of commerce, put in place, if, God forbid, the dollar were to vaporize. It would be interesting if the states could begin creating their own systems of currency… which brings us back to the collective society: If our current system of finance were to collapse, it very well can take the entire country down; whereas, if each state were to use their own currencies, each state would not be weakened by the fiscal policies of the others. Something to ponder for sure.

    This is one very interesting idea that I read…
    Free Competition in Currency Act of 2009, by Congressman Ron Paul

  5. Speaking of putting all your eggs in one basket:
    Consider the two big bubble and bust economies that have lead us to recession, in the early part of this decade, and this most recent recession. In the 90’s, perhaps we vested too much faith in the upcoming Internet boom; and irrefutably, the government, and banks, pushing out more and more house loans, at very low interest rates, was also not a very prudent, long-term investment. They feel good while we are all living large, however, once the bubble bursts, we suffer the consequences.

    I guess this could also fit into redundancy as well… We need to base our economic growth on several factors, and not just one…

    Perhaps that gold rush mentality has been part of nation’s fabric for one too many years… I would like to see renewed ingenuity in manufacturing; as well as looser regulations, so that our nation’s entrepreneurs can get busy again!

  6. Please also see:
    Collectivism verses Individualism

Leave a Reply

Email This Post Email This Post