<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The HyperBlogCafe &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Is No Friend To The Free-Market</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/romney-is-no-friend-to-the-free-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/romney-is-no-friend-to-the-free-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As those of us on the right have long known, a free-market economy, free of incessant Government intervention, is a hallmark of Conservatism in American politics. And, amid the skepticism, in regards to Romney&#8217;s sincerity on Conservative politics, and Limited Government, he recently made two statements that were very telling: 1. &#8220;My view is to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As those of us on the right have long known, a free-market economy, free of incessant Government intervention, is a hallmark of Conservatism in American politics. And, amid the skepticism, in regards to Romney&#8217;s sincerity on Conservative politics, and Limited Government, he recently made two statements that were very telling:</em></p>
<p><em>1. &#8220;My view is to allow the minimum wage to rise with the CPI (basically, a measurement of inflation), or with another index&#8230;&#8221; (<a href="http://youtu.be/1-oGn6-dypE" target="_blank">video</a>)</em></p>
<p><em>2. &#8221;I&#8217;m not concerned about the very poor, we have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I&#8217;ll fix it.&#8221; (<a href="http://t.co/8Z6k49x2" target="_blank">video</a>)</em></p>
<p><em>Allow the minimum wage to rise? Keep up with inflation? Repair the (<strong>Federal</strong>) safety-net?</em></p>
<p><em>Minimum wage, while on the surface, may seem compassionate, it is actually a policy that keeps the skilled-workers working, and freezes out the less-skilled, and first-time workers. And, Inflation is caused by the incessant printing of money by The Federal Reserve, which devalues our currency, and causes all goods and services to rise in cost. Therefore, if I am not mistaken, Mitt Romney is basically suggesting that, under his Presidency, inflation, the minimum wage, and the welfare state, are here to stay, and will be tweaked, and adjusted, by the Technocratic Manipulators in his Administration!</em></p>
<p><em>So, while Mitt and friends, continue to print monopoly money, and prices continue to rise &#8211; some of us, who are fortunate enough to be employed, as the minimum wage increases, will be employed, and the rest of society will survive by living in the demoralizing world of  food stamps and welfare?</em></p>
<p><em>Minimum wage, inflation, and the Federal safety-net, are all a creation of BIG GOVERNMENT; and, over the years, has been protected, and maintained, by a Federal Government that has long forsaken, and far exceeded, it&#8217;s Constitutional Limits! All three go against the very principles of a Free-Market economy; all three add up to tax increases; and, all three fly right in the face of Conservative economic policy in The United States! Mitt Romney,  not only is no friend to The Free-Market, but, he is most certainly not a friend to The United States Constitution!</em></p>
<p><em>Romney&#8217;s remarks only confirm, and underscore, the fact that, just because one is a successful businessman, it doesn&#8217;t mean they understand how a free-market economy is suppose to function.</em></p>
<p><em>I, therefore, stand by my belief that, we are not in need of a successful businessman in The White House, but, rather, a person who understands The Constitution, and will work to return us to our Constitutional Foundation!</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<em>Posted also at <a href="http://conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/romney-is-no-friend-to-the-free-market/" target="_blank">Conservative Daily News</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/romney-is-no-friend-to-the-free-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Streamlining The Military Is Not Isolationism</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-streamlining-the-military-is-not-isolationism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-streamlining-the-military-is-not-isolationism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is a great monologue, by John Stossel, astutely, pointing out, how streamlining our military, and being for a strong national &#8220;defense,&#8221; only, is not isolationism. Enjoy! &#8211; &#8211;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Below is a great monologue, by John Stossel, astutely, pointing out, how streamlining our military, and being for a strong national &#8220;defense,&#8221; only, is not isolationism.</em></p>
<p><em>Enjoy!</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<object width="350" height="270" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X1i2GyZB8Rs?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="350" height="270" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X1i2GyZB8Rs?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object><br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-streamlining-the-military-is-not-isolationism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not About Their Vision Or Values</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/its-not-about-their-vision-or-values/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/its-not-about-their-vision-or-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every two years, when there are national elections in The United States, inevitably, we hear pundits ask these types of questions: What vision do they have for our country? What direction do they want to lead our country? What values do they hold? While such things may appeal to the sensibilities of voters, and are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Every two years, when there are national elections in The United States, inevitably, we hear pundits ask these types of questions: What vision do they have for our country? What direction do they want to lead our country? What values do they hold?</em></p>
<p><em>While such things may appeal to the sensibilities of voters, and are a clever way for politicians to win our votes, I often take exception to these sorts of questions:</em></p>
<p><em>In our Federal Constitution, The framers gave The United States Congress 16 explicit, and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#a1_sec8" target="_blank">Enumerated Powers</a>, to which they could legislate. And, since then, there has been 27 subsequent Amendments. Nowhere in our Constitution is it written that anyone in our Federal Government shall have the power to legislate the values or morals of each &#8220;individual&#8221; in this union of &#8220;sovereign states.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>By no means, am I suggesting that values are not important. The values we hold, are a core part of who we are, and of our very existence.  However, each of us has our own set of values, our own morals, and our own faiths. The Founders also made We The People the sovereigns in this Federalist system of ours, and outside of the Limited and Defined, Constitutional Powers, that We The People have given to our Federal Government, all other things should be left to our respective states, or to us, as sovereign individuals. </em></p>
<p><em>Therefore, in my humble opinion, the above questions should be answered as such:</em><br />
<em>The vision, and direction of our &#8220;Federal Government,&#8221; should always be moving in the direction that our Federal Constitution, &#8221;explicitly,&#8221; calls for; which is the formula that made this country great from it&#8217;s inception. Period!</em></p>
<p><em>Regardless if I share the same values, or faith, as a person running for office, I still expect them to uphold the very document that they have taken an oath to; and let us, the people of this great country, decide how we should best govern &#8220;<strong>our own lives</strong>!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<em>Posted also at <a href="http://conservativedailynews.com/2012/01/its-not-about-their-vision-or-values/" target="_blank">Conservative Daily News</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/its-not-about-their-vision-or-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When George W. Bush Had It Right</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/when-george-w-bush-had-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/when-george-w-bush-had-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is a video clip of the 2000 Presidential debates, where George W. Bush (Republican candidate) was debating Al Gore (Democrat candidate) for the office of President of The United States. The Bush Administration, after 911, was criticized harshly, for their foreign and domestic policies, in regards to the war on terrorism; which led to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Below is a video clip of the 2000 Presidential debates, where George W. Bush (Republican candidate) was debating Al Gore (Democrat candidate) for the office of President of The United States. The Bush Administration, after 911, was criticized harshly, for their foreign and domestic policies, in regards to the war on terrorism; which led to the invasion of Iraq, The Patriot Act, and many other things, that were rightly scrutinized, in regards to policy, and The United States Constitution. As I listen to the below clip, I believe that <strong>candidate</strong> Bush was <strong>spot on</strong>, in regards to his philosophy on foreign policy, war, nation-building etc. The question that I, and many others, would ask, is, why are so many candidates so right when running for office, then, after elected, precede to trample right over our Constitution and Civil Liberties? That is a question that remains one of the great mysteries, and a sad reality, of American politics! </p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<object width="350" height="270"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F9SOVzMV2bc?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F9SOVzMV2bc?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="270" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
&#8211;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/when-george-w-bush-had-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why War Is The Death Of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-war-is-the-death-of-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-war-is-the-death-of-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the below monologue, by Judge Andrew Napolitano, he makes a brilliant case against non-defensive, and unnecessary wars. And, how war equals the growth of Central Governments, and the death of Personal Liberty: Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com ‎&#8221;War is the death of freedom because war is the health of Big Government.&#8221; - Judge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In the below monologue, by Judge Andrew Napolitano, he makes a brilliant case against non-defensive, and unnecessary wars. And, how war equals the growth of Central Governments, and the death of Personal Liberty: </em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/embed.js?id=1269071638001&#038;w=466&#038;h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com">video.foxbusiness.com</a></noscript></p>
<p><em>‎&#8221;War is the death of freedom because war is the health of Big Government.&#8221;<br />
- Judge Andrew Napolitano</em></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<em>And, <a href="http://lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano28.1.html" target="_blank">here</a> is the text to the above (video) monologue.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-war-is-the-death-of-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America Is The Greatest Country Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/america-is-the-greatest-country-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/america-is-the-greatest-country-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;America is the greatest country ever. We had the greatest [U.S. Constitution] document, we’ve had the most amount of freedom and the most amount of prosperity. We have a lot of goodness, but you can’t spread goodness with force. So, we cancel out all our goodness when we go around telling people that they either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;America is the greatest country ever. We had the greatest [U.S. Constitution] document, we’ve had the most amount of freedom and the most amount of prosperity. We have a lot of goodness, but you can’t spread goodness with force. So, we cancel out all our goodness when we go around telling people that they either do it our way or we’ll bomb you; if you do it our way, we’ll give you money. That is not what made America great. America is great because we have a great institution and great traditions. We believe in freedom&#8230; but we’ve lost our way.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>- Congressman Ron Paul</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/america-is-the-greatest-country-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Government In Connection With The Currency</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-national-government-in-connection-with-the-currency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-national-government-in-connection-with-the-currency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Garfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes-inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes-presidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation. These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.&#8221; </em></p>
<p><em>- James Garfield (<a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25823#axzz1cvy727Bu" target="_blank">Inaugural Address</a> - 1881)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/the-national-government-in-connection-with-the-currency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Successful Business Owners Benefit Us All</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-successful-business-owners-benefit-us-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-successful-business-owners-benefit-us-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over and over, we hear from the far-left in this country how, the rich should be paying their fair-share. And, there is this continued presumption by the left, that, the rich owe citizens more and more simply because they are rich. It is well-established that the rich in this country pay far more taxes then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Over and over, we hear from the far-left in this country how, the rich should be paying their fair-share. And, there is this continued presumption by the left, that, the rich owe citizens more and more simply because they are rich. It is well-established that the rich in this country pay far more taxes then any other group of citizens. In fact, there is a vast amount of American citizens who are currently paying no Federal Income Tax, whatsoever. So, the logical question that should be asked, is, why are these citizens not paying their so-called, fair-share?</em></p>
<p><em>I recently saw <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOyDR2b71ag&amp;feature=share" target="_blank">this clip</a> of Elizabeth Warren, where she says, &#8220;There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own.&#8221; That, in my humble opinion, and in the context of how she framed it, is not only very disturbing, but it also confirms another presumption by the left, that, business owners, who have become successful in business, are the only ones who gain from their business. Nothing could be further from the truth! For example, let&#8217;s consider a local supermarket: Every day, that supermarket works around the clock to bring fresh food products to &#8220;their communities.&#8221; This is a &#8220;luxury&#8221; that we Americans really take for granted; but, this luxury is a direct result of our mostly free-market economy, and the entrepreneur who &#8220;took the risk&#8221; and opened that supermarket.</em></p>
<p><em>We also need to consider the hundreds of employees that the supermarket owner employs. And, how about the thousands of companies that manufacture these food products? The supermarket owner, by buying and selling their products, has helped those companies to grow; and, by extension, has helped those respective companies to hire more people, as their needs grow.</em></p>
<p><em><span id="more-15361"></span></em></p>
<p><em>The value that this supermarket owner created, has not only benefited their community, but it has benefited thousands of people all over the country. And this is only a few of the thousands of examples that one could think of, when pondering all the &#8220;reciprocal benefits&#8221; of a successful business.</em></p>
<p><em>When most of us clock out, and go home for the evening; or spend our weekends in leisure, we should consider the millions of people who have worked around the clock, rarely took off, and sacrificed most of their leisure time, and personal lives, so that they could create a successful business &#8211; that not only bettered their lives, but hundreds, if not thousands of lives as well.</em></p>
<p><em>Therefore, for anyone who wants to continue believing that rich people and business owners are just greedy, and out for themselves, I would ask you to reconsider your mode of thinking, and try to see how, and why, we should actually be  grateful to most of the people who have become wealthy in our country.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/why-successful-business-owners-benefit-us-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By A Continuing Process Of Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/by-a-continuing-process-of-inflation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/by-a-continuing-process-of-inflation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes-inflation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they also confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.  There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they also confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.  There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency.&#8221; </em></p>
<p><em>-  John Maynard Keynes</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/by-a-continuing-process-of-inflation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eating The Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/eating-the-rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/eating-the-rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Artwork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=15348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By A.F. Branco Copyright © 2011 A.F. Branco  www.comicallyincorrect.com  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/eating-the-rich.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-363   aligncenter" title="Eating The Rich" src="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/eating-the-rich.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="375" /></a></p>
<address style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"> B</span></span></span><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">y A.F. Branco</span></span></span></address>
<address style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Copyright © 2011 A.F. Branco</span></span></span></address>
<address style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"> <a href="http://www.comicallyincorrect.com/comicallyincorrect_002.htm" target="_blank">www.comicallyincorrect.com</a></span></span></span></address>
<address style="text-align: center;"> </address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/eating-the-rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

