<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arlen Specter Changes Parties-Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/arlen-specter-changes-parties-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/arlen-specter-changes-parties-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: markross</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/arlen-specter-changes-parties-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=6625#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>It looks like you can now add an &quot;I&quot; to Specter&#039;s incessant flip-flopping from party to party. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you can now add an &quot;I&quot; to Specter&#039;s incessant flip-flopping from party to party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markross</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/arlen-specter-changes-parties-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=6625#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>With the (continued) bi-partisanship climate that we are still experiencing in D.C., this move can certainly be a bit disconcerting; at the same time, I wish all of our Senators and Congressman would move to Independent, and operate as one party again.

I think that being an Independent frees you of the bi-partisan chains, and allows you to think for yourself, without feeling some obligation to a particular party.

While I realize that Specter was likely doing this in order to remain in the Senate, I would not be surprised to see this happening more frequently, on both sides of the isle. I, for one, welcome it!

Both parties are a complete failure in my opinion, and in total need of reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the (continued) bi-partisanship climate that we are still experiencing in D.C., this move can certainly be a bit disconcerting; at the same time, I wish all of our Senators and Congressman would move to Independent, and operate as one party again.</p>
<p>I think that being an Independent frees you of the bi-partisan chains, and allows you to think for yourself, without feeling some obligation to a particular party.</p>
<p>While I realize that Specter was likely doing this in order to remain in the Senate, I would not be surprised to see this happening more frequently, on both sides of the isle. I, for one, welcome it!</p>
<p>Both parties are a complete failure in my opinion, and in total need of reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markross</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/arlen-specter-changes-parties-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=6625#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt that this was done out of political expediency. 

From what I understand, Specter first wanted to run as an Independent, but for some reason, was not able to do that; at which point, I think that he should have stepped down, and put the people who voted for him first.

I definitely agree on the point of the filibuster; if The Democrats get one more vote, and the filibuster proof majority, then there will be a much better chance for one party to push through agendas without much (if any) serious debate.

I don&#039;t really have many feelings about Specter, one way or the other, however, I do not see him as an ideologue. I still believe that he will still vote both ways, which will be much less of a threat then someone like Al Franken, should he make it to The Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that this was done out of political expediency. </p>
<p>From what I understand, Specter first wanted to run as an Independent, but for some reason, was not able to do that; at which point, I think that he should have stepped down, and put the people who voted for him first.</p>
<p>I definitely agree on the point of the filibuster; if The Democrats get one more vote, and the filibuster proof majority, then there will be a much better chance for one party to push through agendas without much (if any) serious debate.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have many feelings about Specter, one way or the other, however, I do not see him as an ideologue. I still believe that he will still vote both ways, which will be much less of a threat then someone like Al Franken, should he make it to The Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markross</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/arlen-specter-changes-parties-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>markross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/?p=6625#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>It looks like there is now one more name to add... 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/senators_changed_parties.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/commo...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there is now one more name to add&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/senators_changed_parties.htm" target="_blank">http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/commo&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

