Below is a great monologue, by John Stossel, astutely, pointing out, how, militarily-speaking, being for a strong national “defense” only, and streamlining our military, is not isolationism.

Enjoy!

–

–

Every two years, when there are national elections in The United States, inevitably, we hear pundits ask these types of questions: What vision do they have for our country? What direction do they want to lead our country? What values do they hold?

While such things may appeal to the sensibilities of voters, and are a clever way for politicians to win our votes, I often take exception to these sorts of questions:

In our Federal Constitution, The framers gave The United States Congress 16 explicit, and Enumerated Powers, to which they could legislate. And, since then, there has been 27 subsequent Amendments. Nowhere in our Constitution is it written that anyone in our Federal Government shall have the power to legislate the values or morals of each “individual” in this union of “sovereign states.”

By no means, am I suggesting that values are not important. The values we hold, are a core part of who we are, and of our very existence.  However, each of us has our own set of values, our own morals, and our own faiths. The Founders also made We The People the sovereigns in this Federalist system of ours, and outside of the Limited and Defined, Constitutional Powers, that We The People have given to our Federal Government, all other things should be left to our respective states, or to us, as sovereign individuals. 

Therefore, in my humble opinion, the above questions should be answered as such:
The vision, and direction of our “Federal Government,” should always be moving in the direction that our Federal Constitution, ”explicitly,” calls for; which is the formula that made this country great from it’s inception. Period!

Regardless if I share the same values, or faith, as a person running for office, I still expect them to uphold the very document that they have taken an oath to; and let us, the people of this great country, decide how we should best govern “our own lives!”

–
Posted also at Conservative Daily News

Below is a video clip of the 2000 Presidential debates, where George W. Bush (Republican candidate) was debating Al Gore (Democrat candidate) for the office of President of The United States. The Bush Administration, after 911, was criticized harshly, for their foreign and domestic policies, in regards to the war on terrorism; which led to the invasion of Iraq, The Patriot Act, and many other things, that were rightly scrutinized, in regards to policy, and The United States Constitution. As I listen to the below clip, I believe that candidate Bush was spot on, in regards to his philosophy on foreign policy, war, nation-building etc. The question that I, and many others, would ask, is, why are so many candidates so right when running for office, then, after elected, precede to trample right over our Constitution and Civil Liberties? That is a question that remains one of the great mysteries, and a sad reality, of American politics!

–

–