Archive for » June, 2010 «

 
Tuesday, June 29th, 2010 | Author:

In a time when people are simply attempting to survive job losses and economic challenges, I am reminded of how our country was founded and what turn of events transpired to bring about the greatest experiment in self- governance that has ever been conceived. To fully appreciate how far we have moved away from the original designs of our founding documents, we must first understand where it is that our country came from. In particular we should look at the personal aspirations of the brave souls who fought against all odds to not only come to this new land, but then to battle the tyranny of government from afar and overcome hardships that we dare not imagine.

The history of the United States is mired with many tragic events, wars, popular and unpopular political leaders and outspoken critics of government. Certainly there is no shortage of those types of folks today, however there is a key difference between the political leaders of history and those of today. The missing ingredient – in this writers eyes – is honor. Many, and dare I say most, of our political leaders lack honor. Not ’honor’ in the classical sense, but rather an honor that is so deep that it is espoused as a permanent and integral part of their essence. This honor is of the highest magnitude, it surpasses doing what is right simply because it is right and it holds a stronger bond than any familial blood line; no, this honor is about doing what is right because not doing it would grate infinitely harsh against the inner core of your being, such that you would rather suffer immeasurable and irreparable harm than fail at preserving it.

Too often our political leaders view holding office as a power grab, despite their assertion otherwise. It ends up being their golden parachute or fulfilling an internal desire to be famous. Whatever the reasons may be, it is seldom that we find true statesmen. Who do we have, or have we had in our midst in the last 20 years that would begin to measure up against the bar set so high by those such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams. Certainly they exist, but unfortunately they are very rare. The political climate of today instead reflects the poor quality of self-deserving politicos who would rather do what is expedient for the purposes at hand and forgo doing that which is honorable.

The interesting thing here is that it stems not from politicians, but rather the citizens of this once great country who vote them into office because their personal needs would be better served by a political type buying votes as opposed to one doing what is right and just – honorable. Of course we must not forget those who do not vote, as an abstained vote is tantamount to condoning the status quo or roughly the same as a vote against the trailing candidate. But then this isn’t a lesson on why one should vote, but rather why it is important that we maintain the utmost respect for an institution that transcends individual desires.

read more…
Tuesday, June 29th, 2010 | Author:

 By A.F. Branco
Copyright © 2009 A.F. Branco
 www.afbrancoart.com
 
Category: Artwork, Politics  | Tags:  | One Comment
Tuesday, June 29th, 2010 | Author:

“Congress [in implementing the 16th Amendment] went beyond merely enacting an income tax law and repealed Article IV of the Bill of Rights, by empowering the tax collector to do the very things from which that article says we were to be secure. It opened up our homes, our papers and our effects to the prying eyes of government agents and set the stage for searches of our books and vaults and for inquiries into our private affairs whenever the tax men might decide, even though there might not be any justification beyond mere cynical suspicion.”

“The income tax is bad because it has robbed you and me of the guarantee of privacy and the respect for our property that were given to us in Article IV of the Bill of Rights. This invasion is absolute and complete as far as the amount of tax that can be assessed is concerned. Please remember that under the Sixteenth Amendment, Congress can take 100 percent of our income anytime it wants to. As a matter of fact, right now it is imposing a tax as high as 91 percent. This is downright confiscation and cannot be defended on any other grounds.”

“The income tax is bad because it was conceived in class hatred, is an instrument of vengeance and plays right into the hands of the communists. It employs the vicious communist principle of taking from each according to his accumulation of the fruits of his labor and giving to others according to their needs, regardless of whether those needs are the result of indolence or lack of pride, self-respect, personal dignity or other attributes of men.”

“The income tax is fulfilling the Marxist prophecy that the surest way to destroy a capitalist society is by steeply graduated taxes on income and heavy levies upon the estates of people when they die.” 
(see communist goals)
 
“As matters now stand, if our children make the most of their capabilities and training, they will have to give most of it to the tax collector and so become slaves of the government. People cannot pull themselves up by the bootstraps anymore because the tax collector gets the boots and the straps as well.”
 
“The income tax is bad because it is oppressive to all and discriminates particularly against those people who prove themselves most adept at keeping the wheels of business turning and creating maximum employment and a high standard of living for their fellow men.”
 
“I believe that a better way to raise revenue not only can be found but must be found because I am convinced that the present system is leading us right back to the very tyranny from which those, who established this land of freedom, risked their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to forever free themselves.”
 
Thomas Coleman Andrews (Commissioner of Internal Revenue 1953-1955)
 
Category: Economics, Politics  | Tags:  | 2 Comments
Monday, June 28th, 2010 | Author:

- These words, plus the below, 10 political goals, are from chapter 2 of The Communist Manifesto (1848), “Proletarians and Communists”: 
  
…We have seen above that the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy.
 
The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state, i.e., of the proletariat organized as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.
 
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionizing the mode of production.
 
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
 
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
 
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
 
3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
 
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
 
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
 
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
 
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
 
8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
 
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country.
 
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
read more…
Category: Politics  | Leave a Comment
Sunday, June 27th, 2010 | Author:

adjective [buh-nev-uh-luhnt]
1. Characterized by or expressing goodwill or kindly feelings: a benevolent attitude; her benevolent smile.
2. Desiring to help others; charitable: gifts from several benevolent alumni.
3. Intended for benefits rather than profit: a benevolent institution.
Dictionary.com
Category: Adjectives  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 | Author:

adjective [in-dij-uh-nuhs]
1. Originating in and characteristic of a particular region or country; native (often fol. by to ): the plants indigenous to Canada; the indigenous peoples of southern Africa.
2. innate; inherent; natural (usually fol. by to ): feelings indigenous to human beings.
Dictionary.com
Category: Adjectives  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Sunday, June 20th, 2010 | Author:

Category: The Beatles  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Saturday, June 19th, 2010 | Author:

Category: Led Zeppelin  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 | Author:

adjective [ih-kwan-uh-muhs]
1. Having or showing equanimity; even-tempered: It was difficult to remain equanimous in the face of such impertinence.
Dictionary.com
Category: Adjectives  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Monday, June 14th, 2010 | Author:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

- James Madison (Federalist Papers #45)

Monday, June 14th, 2010 | Author:

noun [ver-NAK-yuh-ler]
1. The plain variety of language in everyday use.
2. The language or vocabulary peculiar to a class or profession.
3. The native speech or language of a place.
4. Any medium or mode of expression that reflects popular taste or indigenous styles.
 
adjective
1. (of language) Native or indigenous.
2. Using the native language of a place.
3. Using plain, everyday language.
Dictionary.com
Category: Adjectives, Nouns  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Monday, June 14th, 2010 | Author:

noun [mon-er-kee]
1. A state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
2. Supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person.
 
monarch (noun) [mon-ahrk]
1. A hereditary sovereign, as a king, queen, or emperor.
2. A sole and absolute ruler of a state or nation.
Dictionary.com
Category: Nouns  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Monday, June 14th, 2010 | Author:

noun [kwin-tes-uhns]
1. The pure and concentrated essence of a substance.
2. The most perfect embodiment of something.
 
Quintessential (adjective) [kwĭn'tə-sěn'shəl]
1. Of, relating to, or having the nature of a quintessence; being the most typical.
Dictionary.com
Category: Adjectives, Nouns  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Sunday, June 13th, 2010 | Author:

On June 12, 2010, Judge Andrew Napolitano launched his new show, Freedom Watch, on The Fox Business Network. On this show, I really appreciated this (below) discussion between The Judge, Congressman Ron Paul (Libertarian), and Sarah Palin (Conservative). I happen to really admire The Judge, Congressman Paul, and Sarah Palin, for their beliefs in our founding values, and our Constitution, as written, and understood, by our founders.

Due to the increasing size and scope of our Federal Government, and the increasing far-left agendas of The Obama Administration, there is no doubt, that even people who previously identified themselves as Conservatives, have increasingly moved further right, to a more Libertarian point of view. It is doubtful that our country could ever go back to a completely Libertarian state, as in the days of our founders, but it is great to see such a Constitutional awakening in our country, and a desire to move closer and closer to our founding values, and The Constitutional principles that made us such a great country, for so many years.

I have often said, “if a plant loses it’s roots,” then the plant could never survive. Conversely, if a country is too far removed from it’s foundation, then God only knows where it could lead. Sadly, the many problems that we are currently experiencing in The United States, is greatly due to the lack of prudence to our Constitution, by our Federal Government, over the last 100 or so years.

Please listen to this insightful and informative discussion:



Watch Freedom Watch

Saturday, June 12th, 2010 | Author:

Since the very early days, following Barack Obama’s Inauguration, and their far-reaching, Big Government, Progressive agenda,  Conservative Americans on the right, have been at great odds with this administration, and the far-left Democrats which currently have the majorities in Congress.

Unfortunately, rather then things improving, it appears that things continue to increasingly get worse, as our national debt sky-rockets, unemployment stays high… and now, an ecological disaster in The Gulf of Mexico, which (containment wise) this administration does not appear to have a great command over.

While it is very understandable to see the right get angry with this far-left agenda, it now appears that the left’s own base is beginning to pile on as well… as they, unbelievably, do not think The Obama Administration is governing far enough to the left.

Politically, things do not look good for The Obama Administration.  As far as the state of The United States, sadly, things do not appear to be getting any better either. Most Americans, anxiously, appear to be looking forward to November and the mid-term elections, to have a peaceful revolution at the ballot box, and hopefully, restore a bit of sanity back into our country. Until then, anger appears to continue bubbling up on both sides of the political fence.

Please listen to Bill O’Reilly on this:



Category: Politics  | Tags:  | 2 Comments
Wednesday, June 09th, 2010 | Author:

noun [pi-NUHM-bruh]
1. An area in which something exists to an uncertain degree.
Dictionary.com
Category: Nouns  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Saturday, June 05th, 2010 | Author:

In Henry Hazlitt‘s 1946 book: Economics in One Lesson, Hazlitt laid out a brilliant (and easy to follow) case for The Free-market sytem of economics. He also makes a case against the quasi-Socialist, Keynesian system of Economics, and The New Deal policies of The Franklin Roosevelt Administration. After re-reading the chapter, “The Curse Of Machinery” (please see Techophobia), which talks in great detail about the past, and the resistance to change, with each new innovation… Also, being that today’s unions are a big topic of discussion, with the current shape of our economy, I thought that I would share this (below) chapter with everyone… I hope that you will fine it as insightful as I did… As well as seeing some modern day parallels between then and now…  Enjoy!
 
Chapter 7, The Curse Of Machinery, by Henry Hazlitt:
 
AMONG the most viable of all economic delusions is the belief that machines on net balance create unemployment. Destroyed a thousand times, it has risen a thousand times out of its own ashes as hardy and vigorous as ever. Whenever there is long-continued mass unemployment, machines get the blame anew. This fallacy is still the basis of many labor union practices. The public tolerates these practices because it either believes at bottom that the unions are right, or is too confused to see just why they are wrong.
 
The belief that machines cause unemployment, when held with any logical consistency, leads to preposterous conclusions. Not only must we be causing unemployment with every technological improvement we make today, but primitive man must have started causing it with the first efforts he made to save himself from needless toil and sweat. 
read more…
Category: Economics, Politics  | One Comment
Thursday, June 03rd, 2010 | Author:

On Friday, May 28, 2010, Glenn Beck, with his two guests, David Barton and Lucas Morel, did a great show on America’s Black Founders… So often, and rightfully so, we talk about great founders such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson; but many of us were really surprised, and quite honestly, angry, that much of this great history was not shared in our textbooks, and taught in our public schools. As a consequence, too many distortions, in mainstream American history, have been perpetuated over the years.
 
I hope that we will see more shows like this, so that African American citizens will be rightfully appreciated for their great contributions to our country; and so our history, which has been distorted, can be corrected.
 
The good news is, back then, there were many black citizens, who certainly contributed to our great country, in more ways then most of us realize. I am very thankful to Glenn for bringing this (below) history to the forefront of American culture.
 
Enjoy! 
 
Part 1

read more…
Wednesday, June 02nd, 2010 | Author:

“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

- John Adams