So far, while I do not see much that I agree (at least in regards to his approach) with the president about, on domestic policies, I am very pleased that he is taking a strong stance on terrorism.
As I understand it, he is going to “responsibly” wean the troops out of Iraq, and build up the military presence in Afghanistan.
Another thing that I have “always” been against was the idea of nation building, and they seem to be moving away from nation building, and getting back to basics, which is to fight these terrorists that perpetuated the attacks of 911.
Listen, not many people (that I know of) like war; war is very ugly, and I wish we did not have to be wrapped up in “any” foreign affairs, however, we did not ask for two airplanes to come flying into two skyscrapers in NYC, killing over 2000 people, and we should not send a message to countries that we are weak, and that they can get away with such horrific acts.
The war in Afghanistan may not be a war that can officially be won, in the traditional sense, however, it is our duty to see that these terrorists are brought to their knees, and brought to justice.
I hope that other countries will continue to join us on our original “war on terrorism”, against Al Queada, and other radical groups (in Afghanistan) that seek to harm innocent people with their cowardly acts.
Many countries, including India, Spain and England have been attacked by these terrorists, and free people should not be held captive by these cowards.
So for this stance on terrorism, I say Kudos to President Obama; on this policy, I am behind him 150%.
Daniel Hannan is a British politician, and Member of The European Parliament (MEP), who represents South East England for the Conservative Party, laid into Prime Minister Gordon Brown on his enormous amount of government spending during this economic downturn in England.
I think that his direct speech to the prime minister was absolutely brilliant. I believe that someone needs be as frank with our president, as their unbelievable spending in D.C., as of late, can very well put us on a similar path, if the spending brakes are not put on soon.
In my opinion, Daniel Hannan is an English patriot.
In 1765, The British enacted The Stamp Act, which would require all newspapers, pamphlets, legal documents, commercial bills, advertisements, and other documents issued in the colonies, to use a stamp.
The British would then collect tax revenues for these stamps, and use these revenues for the defense of the colonies. Being that the tax was used for their defense, wouldn’t one conclude that this tax was well-intended? Why then were the colonists so outraged? So outraged that movements such as The Sons of Liberty were started; as well as the convening of Congress, in Oct. of 1765, in New York City, where The Declaration of Rights and Grievances were written.
Most of us know that the colonies were being taxed, but did not have representation in Parliament, back in England. Is it possible that the people of the colonies felt disenfranchised?
Perhaps we can get into their heads for a moment…
-
OK, the government is going to take tax revenues from us, then use it for this, or for that. However, no one has consulted us. Perhaps we have a different view; perhaps we have an alternative idea that will makes sense, and may satisfy a larger majority of people, as opposed to, this is how it is, and you will like it.
-
Eventually, Parliament being faced with a loss of trade, repealed the Stamp Act in 1766.
For anyone that is not aware of this, we do have a constitutional right in this country to petitionour government; and it is with great thanks to our founders that we have this, and other first amendment rights.
I believe it is a moral injustice to force something on people, that through a great majority, did not agree with the end result; clearly they were tired of Britain controlling their way of life, and of doing business.
The American Revolution did not take place until eleven years later; and the rest is certainly history. However, if we look back, perhaps the whole revolution could have been avoided “if” The British government would have listened to the pleas of the colonies. It is really hard to imagine it working out that way, because we would not have The United States today, and we would quite possibly still be part of England, but that is not the case, and today, we all know why.
So, here we are in modern times, saying, this is not the most prudent use of our tax dollars, and it is totally affecting our lives, our businesses etc….and we want change! If you read The Declaration of Independence, in its entirety, they listed a whole host of grievances against Britain; so surely Britain must have known that the pot was boiling over, however, they did not want to make the necessary changes, and the rest is history.
I do pray that our government will see that the people are getting very weary of the normal course of doing business in D.C., and begin to come back to the grass roots, and get down to the level of the every day person; otherwise, it is not too hard to imagine that the people will eventually need a party that will represent them again, and not the special interests of a few; and policies that will encompass the needs and concerns of the entire country, and not “just” a constituency of people.
In The Declaration of Independence, our founding fathers declared, that we have three very basic rights; and they are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I pray that we never lose these rights.
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transientcauses; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariablythe same Object, evincesa design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyrannyover these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
noun
1. Government in which one person has uncontrolled or unlimited authority over others; the government or power of an absolute monarch.
2. A nation, state, or community ruled by an autocrat.
3. Unlimited authority, power, or influence of one person in any group.
Dictionary.com
noun
1. The rule of a despot; the exercise of absolute authority.
2. Absolute power or control; tyranny.
3. An absolute or autocratic government.
4. A country ruled by a despot.
Dictionary.com
OK,
Well, here we go again…
AIG, who received 175 billion in public tax payer dollars, in an attempt by the federal government to rescue this “failed” company, reported a historical loss of 6.7 billion in the last quarter (Oct-Dec) of 2008. Most people (I would think), in this scenario, would likely find it hard to believe that “any” executive, in this company would have “earned” a bonus. Nonetheless, AIG just recently gave 165 million dollars in bonuses to several executives.
Again, let me re-iterate, they receive 175 billion of “our” tax dollars, in the last quarter of 2008, they report the biggest loss by a company, in American history, and they just rewarded several executives with millions of dollars in bonuses.
When, and where will this madness end?
You can read more below…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/15/obama-advisers-lash-aig-millions-bonuses/
Mark
TARP funds being used overseas?
Actually this does not come as a complete surprise to me; upon receiving this money, there has been little over site and regulation of these banks…
I have been very skeptical (from day one) as to where these funds have gone, ended up, and how they have been used. While I do not generally like to speculate, one of my theories has been that these banks are investing this (our money) money into foreign banks.
At this time, there is still little information, however, there are people working on it…
To name a few…
Neil Barofsky and Elizabeth Warren
Congressman Dennis Kucinich, who is chairing The Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, recently disclosed the below information…
Citibank, who received 50 billion dollars of tax payer money, has invested 8 billion dollars into private sector companies, in the country of Dubai.
Bank of America, who received 45 billion dollars of tax payer money, spent 7 billion in China Construction Bank, which “may” go right to my theory.
JP Morgan Chase, who received 25 billion dollars of tax payer money, spent 1 billion dollars on public companies in India.
I am sure that more is to come, and my prediction is that heads will be rolling; and perhaps, rightfully so.
While I am not against foreign investment, by American companies, weren’t we sold on the fact that this (tax payer) money was going to be used to prop up The American economy?
Mark
adjective
1.Holding or tending to hold persistently to something, such as a point of view.
2.Holding together firmly; cohesive: a tenacious material.
3.Clinging to another object or surface; adhesive: tenacious lint.
4.Tending to retain; retentive: a tenacious memory.
noun
Tenacity
1.The quality or state of being tenacious; as, tenacity, or retentiveness, of memory; tenacity, or persistency, of purpose.
Dictionary.com
verb1. To make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.).
2. To set forth or teach publicly (a creed, doctrine, etc.)
Dictionary.com
This is a great version of Going to California, live, in 1975, at Earl’s Court Arena in London.
“Standing on a hill in my mountain of dreams, telling myself it’s not as hard, hard, hard as it seems”.
Enjoy!
–
In all of my life, as an United States citizen, 911 is definitely one of the most profound, and saddest times that I can recall. As sad as it was, I can still recall the solidarity of The American people, shortly after 911.
All of a sudden, your political affiliations did not seem to matter; your career, your past and present situations also did not seem to matter; all that mattered was that we were fellow Americans and this radical terrorist group just took down two large buildings in a major United States city, in which nearly 3,000 innocent people were killed; not to mention, the many rescue personnel that came to the call, and gave their lives, as well.
Like many others, I desperately wanted time to move quickly, as the pain, grief and anger that I felt was so intense. Still, I often think back, and recall how united we (as a country) were.
–
–
I will never forget watching The President on TV, and feeling really touched by his words, and his call for Americans to stay united; he also seemed just as in shock as we were; he shared in our grief, fear and anger; undoubtedly, he was not the same man that he was prior to 911.
That day, our country could very well had been brought to its knees; however, there was a call for Americans to get back out there and live. We were directed “not” to let these hateful terrorists to cause us to live in fear, and we heard the call. I recall people coming out, and vocalizing their anger at these people, and publicly declaring that we were not going to stop living The American life because of their despicable acts.
I can still recall the president quoting Psalms 23, and having tears fill my eyes while listening. Yes, that day, we walked in the shadow of the valley of death, however, we were able to rise out from behind that shadow.
–
–
In my opinion, this is one of the most classic moments from a president, in American history…With his arm around a fireman, in NY City, he said that he heard us, the world heard us, and the people that knocked these buildings down, were all going to soon hear us. Then the crowd began chanting, USA! USA!… a very touching moment!Another fact that some may recall is, Americans, in NY, were starting to rough up Middle Eastern people on the streets, and the president called on the people “not” to hold innocent people responsible for these acts; he did not allow us to go down to the same level as these terrorists, and that was not to take our anger out on innocent people.
–
–
In retrospect, I truly do believe that most Americans were united in the fact that we had to go after the terrorists who perpetuated these acts; we now knew that the attacks were planned and implemented by Al-Quaeda who were operating primarily in Afghanistan. So, within a month, American troops were deployed, with much of the free world behind us. Shortly thereafter, we were told that Iraq was somehow involved; to the surprise of many, we reluctantly went along with this premise;and sadly, the war in Iraq seems to have been the factor that has divided many Americans, and caused many fractured relationships between ourselves and other countries; leaving many Americans very skeptical our own government.
That being said, we were attacked on 911, by some very extreme individuals who wanted nothing more then to bring The United States, as we know it, to its knees. I must admit, as much as I longed for it, I never went back to a pre-911 mindset. My thoughts on politics, military, and national security were forever changed. Thousands and thousands of brave Americans left the comfort of home and went to war for the rest of us; many of them are no longer with us. Our military personnel are truly brave people who have made tremendous sacrifices while the rest of us moved on and tried to forget that horrific day.
No matter what your thoughts on politics are, no matter how you feel about the post 911 strategy, I, for one, say, we must never forget that day and the brave people that came to our call; and the tremendous solidarity that we shared. We should always remember the lesson learned that day: we are all Americans first, and no matter what any one tells me, I do believe, deep in our hearts, we do care tremendously for each other.
I pray that it will not take another cataclysmic event for us to all be reminded of these lessons.
I truly do believe that we are a blessed country, that was brought into existence by great men, with divine intervention. The American dream will never die, as long as “we“ never let it die.
Well, this Omnibus Bill (or should we call it The Ominous Bill), for the funding of our federal government, passed through The Senate today, with a vote of 62-35, and is expected to be signed on Wednesday, by the president. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/10/senate-ready-clear-huge-spending-obama/
Many Americans, including myself, are deeply disappointed and concerned about this complete, fiscally irresponsible spending that we are seeing since the new administration took office. We are in a very serious economic situation, and every day we hear, the federal government spent another billion on this, then another billion on that.
Unemployment just reached a 25 year high of approximately 8%, and this bill increased federal government spending by approximately 8%. So, while Americans are increasingly loosing their jobs, and cutting back on just about every thing that we can, our government is increasing their budget by 8%?
Two top Democrats, Senator Bayh of Indiana, and Senator Feingold of Wisconsin, both voted against this bill because of the cost, and this spending is simply way out of control, and seemingly, unsustainable.
You can watch more on this here… (interview with Senator Bayh)
http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=3792704&referralPlaylistId=playlist
–
Barack Obama explicitly said, on his campaign, I will cut out those earmarks…Verbatim–
“And, absolutely, we need earmark reform. And when I’m president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely”.
Now, this most recent bill has over 8,000 earmarks, with an approximate cost of 14 billion dollars, 4 billion of which is money for earmarks.
So I ask, how are we suppose to have an economic recovery when the federal government is spending money like there is no tomorrow?
Is this change we can believe in?
Mark