Archive for » January, 2009 «
 Each experience in life, teaches us something new about life Written by Mark Ross
As shadows fall on my heart
and evening grows near.
A groaning call from the dark,
stirs dreadfully grim fear.
The howling winds at my back,
cuts deep into my brain.
The frightful bends and the crack
of trees expose my pain.
As thunder claps in the night
and lightning fills the sky,
the timid act on their fright
for fear that they might die.
The woe inside is conceived
from stories filled with dread.
when not denied, but believed,
into that realm we tread.
Have no dread of idle fear,
for it can do no harm.
Keep instead a beaming cheer
and spread a joyous charm.
Copyright © 2009 Keith Blackie
adjective 1.Selecting and using what seems best from various sources or systems; made up of selections from various sources. Dictionary.com
Many times in life we are faced with circumstances that put us in a position that require us to break ties with a current employer, spouse, friend or business partner. When those times come about, our first instinct is to cut the ties and cut them clean leaving a trail of destruction behind us. In other words to burn our bridges.
We have heard it told many times that we should never burn our bridges. This comes from the idea that when the times have changed we may find ourselves in need of our past relationship and if we had severed all ties cleanly and “burned our bridges” coming back later wouldn’t be an option. Consider the married couple that has children and gets divorced. Presumably the couple had issues that couldn’t be resolved, but that doesn’t mean they cannot get along and rely upon one another amicably. In the end, when one parent has troubles, they can rely upon the other for support in managing problems related to the children. In this way, the children are benefitted and the children are not put at odds between parents. Clearly this is one of those instances where burning your bridges wouldn’t be advised. If for no other reason than to allow your children to grow up well adjusted and with two loving parents.
All isn’t roses when we end a relationship. There may have been personal tensions and problems. We may find ourselves in a position where we want to tell our boss just where he can stick his job and how far to stick it. Oh how overwhelming the drive can be, but in this instance, it is once again advisable to retain an amicable separation. How many times have people went out on a whim, desiring a better job, more pay, etc. and thinking they found it, told their boss “take this job and shove it” .. there was even a song written about it. Deep down, I think we all have a secret desire to inflict some sort of retribution on those who held us back or treated us like so much trash. This desire, no matter how good it might make you feel is typically not the best use of energy. Consider what happens when you find out that the greener pastures were astro-turf. Crawling back to your previous employer after burning your bridge isn’t a desirable experience and it certainly wouldn’t endear your ex-employer to give you your job back. Clearly, it is best to leave under positive terms, at least this way if you ever do need them for something else, they will be more likely to provide it.
After all of this, you have to ask yourself if it is ever appropriate to burn your bridges behind you. In a word yes. However it isn’t in the manner most people would imagine. In the 70′s I made a life change. I decided that I would put away all of my sinful ways and follow Christ. This was a particularly easy transition, the benefits were outstanding, the life I left behind was corruptible and I was headed down the path of unrighteousness … but I made a huge error in judgment. I didn’t burn my bridges behind me. This meant that when my Christian walk became tough, I could turn around and head back to where I came from … and I did. Even in 1990 when I turned back around and crossed the bridge in the right direction, I once again failed to burn that bridge and found myself headed back across it by 2002. It is now 2009 and although I don’t generally make resolutions, I have decided that 2009 is the year that I officially burn my bridges to my past sinful life. I have wasted many trips across that bridge to my past and while the trek back is easy, cutting ties to the past isn’t. How many times have we as Christians turned around and went back to our old ways … the answer is crystal clear … far too many. The good news is that even though we turn back, God will never burn his bridge to us and we are free to cross it. My 2009 resolution to burn the bridges to my old life will undoubtedly be painful and hard, but it is necessary. When I am faced with a remnant of my old life, I must have the resolve to turn away and keep from rebuilding those bridges. You are invited to join me, to burn your bridges to your past ways and live life in the fullness of Christ. Together we can support one another on our Christian path.
verb 1. to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence: They inferred his displeasure from his cool tone of voice.
2. (of facts, circumstances, statements, etc.) to indicate or involve as a conclusion; lead to.
3. to guess; speculate; surmise.
4. to hint; imply; suggest.
-verb (used without object) 5. to draw a conclusion, as by reasoning. Dictionary.com
verb 1.To frighten; overcome with fear
2.To discourage; lesson the courage of Dictionary.com
This is indeed a historical moment as president-elect Obama, our current president George Bush, ex-presidents…George H. Bush, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter all meet at The White House. From my point of view, this meeting shows some level of unity and cooperation amongst the ex-(living)presidents, with president-elect Barack Obama. To the credit of Barack Obama, he requested this meeting and it was arranged by our current president. Also, I would like to say that George W. Bush was very dignified with his words to Barack Obama, in the spirit of unity and love for our country. So, going forward, let’s hope that this meeting will be the beginning of some new hope and unity for our country. Mark
verb 1. to lessen in force or intensity, as wrath, grief, harshness, or pain; moderate.
2. to make less severe: to mitigate a punishment.
3. to make (a person, one’s state of mind, disposition, etc.) milder or more gentle; mollify; appease.
-verb (used without object) 4. to become milder; lessen in severity. Dictionary.com
“This week, Exxon Mobil had to lay off 25 congressmen”.
Jay Leno
Wow! I am not sure if I should be surprised by this news or not; nonetheless, I am… Today, Nancy Pelosi was re-elected as Speaker of The House. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/06/th-congress-convenes-oaths-office/ In a time where much change is needed, in D.C., I (unfortuantely) see very little of it happening. Mark
Peter Kraus – a former top executive at Merrill Lynch received $25 million dollars in compensation (from Merrill Lynch) after only three months’ work. Merrill Lynch was bought out by Bank of America, after Congress injected $25 billion (of taxpayer dollars) into The Bank of America. Here is the stipulation:
Before Merrill hired Kraus as an executive vice president, Kraus negotiated a $50 million dollar pay package for himself – with the bulk of that guaranteed to him if the company was sold. As far as I can see, he did not do anything illegal, however, one would have to ask; morally and ethically, was this the right thing to do? This is yet one more example of rewarding people and companies for failure; and all at the taxpayer’s expense. If that is not enough, have a look at his newly purchased $37 million dollar Park Avenue apartment. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,473967,00.html http://www.nypost.com/seven/12302008/news/regionalnews/fat_cat_palace_is_a_crah_pad_146510.htm Oh yes, Does anyone recall the name Stanley O’Neal? He was the one that walked away from Merrill Lynch with $160 million dollars. http://www.hyperblogcafe.com/stanley-oneal-merrill-lynch/ Anyone out there experiencing difficult times? Apparently these guys aren’t. Again, I would like to thank Congress for their abundant generosity, and wisdom, with our money. Mark
This is a total classic… Bill O’Reilly hammering Barney Frank on the failure (and subsequent events) of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In this video, Bill calls for the resignation of Barney Frank (a congressman, in below interview) Chris Dodd (a senator), and Chris Cox (The Chairman of The Securities Exchange Commission), whose job it is to protect investors… to my knowledge, both Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, are still part of The Federal government. Be forewarned, this is a very heated exchange. Mark –
For many, many months, people have debated about why, and how these bailouts may or may not help the economy, keep companies from tanking, even save jobs. Like many others, I never saw any good in these tax payer subsidized bailouts. However, most recently, our esteemed government cut a check for 17.4 billion dollars of “our” money, as a bridge loan. A bridge to where, is a whole different topic. Of course, I do understand that thousands of employees may have lost their jobs, in Detroit, had these big 3 companies gone under. That being said, I still believed that bankruptcy, restructuring and re-negotiating of union contracts was the natural, and likely, best avenue to take. Well, thanks to excellent research, and reporting from people like Michelle Malkin; after reading this article, I have a feeling that many people will be convinced (if not already) that these union leaders needs to go. As it turns out, we may be subsidizing a bit more then we first realized. You can read her article here… http://townhall.com/Columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/12/31/the_uaws_money-squandering_corruptocracy Below is Michelle discussing her findings on Foxnews Business. Mark

Twitter
Facebook