Archive for » October, 2008 «

Print Post
Friday, October 31st, 2008 | Author: markross

A diamond with a flaw is worth more than a pebble without imperfections.
-Chinese Proverb
Category: Wisdom  | Tags:  | 3 Comments
Print Post
Thursday, October 30th, 2008 | Author: KEB

Brief – compelling, comforting in its own right;
Bringing the flutter of life, high upon majestic waves;
Bent trees, as if weighted atop, tells of its passing;
Life springs forth, welcoming its cool crisp attention;
Stark – the reminder of days when ne’er wind blew
Across deserving and undeserving alike;
When memories of those whose faces were touched
never knew of things to come.
Harsh – truth of being, hides contentment,
As closure beckons the weary traveller to rest
and feast upon the richness of blessings it delivers
in an infinite path to unknown destinations.
Calm – lying unseen, unheard, forever gone,
yet passed in thought, remembered for a lifetime,
comfort given, promises fulfilled, heartily thankful
as life begins anew offering its own rewards of wind

Copyright © 2008 Keith Blackie

Category: Poetry  | Tags:  | 3 Comments
Print Post
Thursday, October 30th, 2008 | Author: markross

verb
1. to utter again or repeatedly.
2. to do (something) over again or repeatedly.
3. to operate or be applied repeatedly, as a linguistic rule or mathematical formula.
    Dictionary.com
 
Reiterate:
verb
1.(transitive) to say or do (something) for a second time, such as for emphasis.
   Let me reiterate my opinion.
   Wiktionary.org
Category: Verbs  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Wednesday, October 29th, 2008 | Author: markross

I just recently started reading that Led Zeppelin may in fact do reunion tour,
but Robert Plant may not be on board. 
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j6YCdYhgoN4yvTiIE84LxBDU_ajQ
 
Robert, in my opinion, is still the greatest rock singer ever, and I do respect his reasons for not wanting to go on a full fledged tour, however, he bums me out, at the same time.
 
In my opinion, he shows the least amount of enthusiasm for the legend and great music of Led Zeppelin and perhaps he is the most honest and realistic member, at the same time.
 
As much as John Paul Jones, Jason Bonham and Jimmy Page would like to do it, I would plead for them to leave good enough alone, if Robert is not on board. Perhaps they could do something musically together, but not as Led Zeppelin.
 
Maybe Robert will have a change of heart, we’ll have to see.
 
Mark
Category: Led Zeppelin  | 12 Comments
Print Post
Tuesday, October 28th, 2008 | Author: markross

Images left behind, caught in space and time.
Forever will they last, when the future moves so fast?
 
As bright as the stars will shine, glowing
gracefully through the night. Will we come together?
Will we last forever?
 
The past is traveling fast, before it we must
be; striving to reach a new height,
a path to which we succeed.
 
To new lands of hope, I wish to sail away; to
think about tomorrow, while living for today.
 
The light at the end of the tunnel,
illuminating more my way, and the gold at the
end of the rainbow, moves closer by the day.
 
Copyright © 2005 Mark Ross
Category: Poetry  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Monday, October 27th, 2008 | Author: KEB

There is a growing movement that concludes that faster than light travel IS possible.

I personally think that the theory Einstein proposed was based on flawed physics. Particle accellerators indeed can accellerate atoms faster than light, regardless of the medium, from the perspective of the viewer (outside the accellerator) the atom travels from A to B faster than light can travel, the same distance.

The grandfather paradox is bunk as is the time travelling aspect of FTL travel. I believe time is linear and unidirectional and as such you can only move forward.

In 100 or 1000 years, I believe my assertions will be proven truthful, as physics, in its entirety is based upon theoretical processes. Theories are modified and adjusted in time. One of the funniest things I can think of regarding physics is the assertion from a world renouned physicist that an automobile could never achieve fuen economy better than 34mpg .. and he proved it using mathematical formulae. The only thing I can suggest is that either the formula was incorrect or the assumptions of energy were incorrect. I suspect the latter. If a physicist cannot correctly determine that a car can’t get better that 34mpg because of energy constraints, then how on earth can I believe then when they state that an arbitrary formula dictates that one cannot travel faster than light?

Category: Science  | 5 Comments
Print Post
Monday, October 27th, 2008 | Author: markross

verb
1. To hold or state as an opinion.
    I had to opine on the situation because I thought a different perspective was in order.
    Wiktionary.org
Category: Verbs  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Monday, October 27th, 2008 | Author: markross

The below, profoundly, wise words were written by our founding fathers (We hold…)
as part of The Declaration of Independence
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”  
Unalienable rights? hmmmm 
 
The line that really strikes me is this one…
“deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”
 
I have felt for a long time that our rights stop, the day after Election Day.
 
It is a great thing that we the people are able to vote our officials into office, however this does make one wonder “if” the people should maintain a larger degree of power, even after the officials are in office.
 
I can see the final sentence, in the above paragraph…
 
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government” 
becoming a reality “if” the government keeps misleading and deceiving the people of this country.
 
Mark
Print Post
Monday, October 27th, 2008 | Author: markross

adjective
1.To blog excessively, non-sequentially, or in more than three spatial dimensions
   Reference for hyper-, taken from Wiktionary.org
  ”to my knowledge, hyperblog is not an actual word”
Category: Adjectives  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Sunday, October 26th, 2008 | Author: markross

I had two thoughts that I have not really heard being raised, at all, during this campaign,
directly related to McCain.
 
1. John McCain does have a record of reform and crossing part lines, which is very appealing
to Independents like myself .
 
However, from the get go, The Republican party screamed and hollered that McCain was NOT a good choice for the conservative movement.
As a result, McCain pandered hard  (in my opinion) to The Republican base, which in effect, pushed him further from the center and more to the right.
Now, those same people are screaming for McCain to win, when in fact, they were integral to hand cuffing him, from the onset, instead of letting him be the man he truly is/was.
Now those same people may have hurt themselves as Obama may very well be their next president.
 
2. I can not help but wonder what effect it would have had “if” McCain would have pulled a Lieberman and registered himself as an Independent, which in effect, would have separated him from a lot of the un popular Republican policies over the last 8 years, while keeping himself firmly distanced from the policies of The Democrats.
 
If McCain is truly that moderate, then why does he not move to an Independent?
I think it would have been a great move for him, politically, and frankly, for the whole country.
 
Mark
Category: Archive  | 4 Comments
Print Post
Sunday, October 26th, 2008 | Author: markross

We have all heard of Albert Einstein’s famous formula but what does it really mean?
 
In short, E= Mc2 tells us how much energy that we can get from a given amount of matter by multiplying the mass (m) by the speed of light (c) 2. This tells us how much “pure energy” can be produced by converting all of the matter in a body into pure energy.
 
I have read that 1 gram of matter, which is a bout 1/3 the mass of a penny, converted completely to heat, could boil roughly 43,000,000 gallons of water, which would be enough water to fill about 85 Olympic swimming pools. 
 
Quite compelling huh?
 
Category: Science  | 12 Comments
Print Post
Saturday, October 25th, 2008 | Author: markross

In the year 1763, after 7 years of war and victory over The North American Continent and the land east of Mississippi, Britain turned it’s attention to The American Colonies.
  
After the huge, resulting, expenditures of war, Britain was now looking to The American Colonies as a way to help offset these expenditures.
 
Let’s take a look at some past events…
 
First were some restrictions put onto the colonies by Britain
 
1. The Navigation Act of September 13, 1660 which basically restricted colonial trade with other nations.
2. The Royal Proclamation – October 7, 1763 which banned the colonies from negotiating land directly with The Indians.
 
So, perhaps at this point (1763), the colonies are concluding that Britain is playing big brother and really trying to control their way of life.
 
It gets even better
 
1. In the year 1764, Britain passed the Sugar Act, this was the first law aimed directly at raising money from the colonies, for the English Crown. It increased the duties on merchandise that were imported into the colonies and not of British origin.
2. Then came The Currency Act. This barred the colonies from printing their own currency.
 
Then on March 24, 1765, the British exacerbated the colonists outrage by passing the Quartering and Stamp Acts.
 
3. The Quartering Act of 1765 forces the colonies to provide lodging and supplies to British soldiers.
 
Taxation without representation
 
The colonists, of course, objected to these acts. At town meetings (Committees of Correspondence), beginning in 1764, in Massachusetts, in opposition to The Currency Act, taxation without representation began being cried out. At one such meeting, a unified protest throughout the colonies, was suggested. The protest of choice was non-importation, or declining to accept merchandise imported from Britain.
 
4. The Stamp Act of 1765 was the first direct tax to be imposed onto the colonies; it required that all newspapers, pamphlets, legal documents, commercial bills, advertisements, and other documents issued in the colonies, to use a stamp.
 
The revenue generated from the sale of the stamps was designated for the defense of the colonies.
While the intentions of raising revenue for this purpose, were good intentions, to many of the colonists, perhaps it was still Britain imposing their will onto the people of the colonies.
 
Of course, many of the businessmen in the colonies were very affected by, and took exception to this tax.
Associations known as The Sons of Liberty were formed to organize opposition to The Stamp Act.
To name a few, well known names… Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, Paul Revere
 
With further reading, you can learn more about the  subsequent events, such as The Boston Tea Party and The signing of The Declaration of Independence, which lead to the eventual American Revolution…
 
 
To draw a modern day parallel,
it isn’t hard to see (in the above) how big government and raising taxes on the people that have worked very hard, with little to no say as to where the taxes are spent and utilized, can be enough to stir some real emotions from the people.
 
While I personally love The American Revolution History, and my country, my intention of this post was to basically present some historical facts, then to let you decide if history is in fact, repeating itself.
 
Mark
Print Post
Friday, October 24th, 2008 | Author: KEB

My wife and I were blessed with tickets to the Brad Paisley concert in Gainesville Florida at the O’Connell Center. The seats were not especially good, upper level-front row, however for the price they were great seats.
 
Promptly at 7:30 pm we were greeted with the first of 2 opening acts. Chuck Wicks could have been a headliner in his own right. I found his music to be lively, upbeat and compelling. Chuck did a trememdous job engaging the audience. I was very pleased with his performance and found myself wanting more. The highlight of his performance surely was when he picked a small girl from the audience and pulled her on stage. The memory of this concert will be with her for a lifetime.
 
While Chuck’s performance was super, the followup act proved to be more of a letdown that I would have ever suspected. I must admit I had never heard of Chuck Wicks before the concert, however I had certainly heard of Jewel and consider myself a fan of sorts. Her music is certainly not bad. Her performance last night however started out poorly with the music drowning out any hope of even a marginal understanding of the words and tones emulating from her vocal cords. During the next hour, I found myself struggling to understand the words or follow the lyrics, even on the songs that I am very familiar with. To say the least I was very disappointed in her performance. A friend of mine commented that a Brad Paisley concert would be boring and he would be ready to leave in side of an hour. During that hour, I found myself in the same situation. I was watching my timepiece like a schoolboy waiting for recess, anxious for the time to pass as quickly as possible. Certainly Jewel is a good performer, but I am left with a bad experience and wonder if perhaps the studios make her sound all the better by being able to tweak the tracks and volume levels. Some performers just sound better in-studio and I know that. I commented to Susan about how the sound mixers must be getting mixed signals because surely they knew the poor quality of the overall output and could have tweaked the vocal track to make the performance bearable, alas, it never came to pass. In the future, perhaps I’ll just stick to Jewel CDs and leave the concerts to the hardcore fans enamored with youth, beauty and fame.
 
All was not lost, at nearly 9:30, the darkened stage erupted with the sights and sounds of Brad-O-Vision. Somewhere the lighting engineers had failed to connect “prong A” into “slot A” because a full 1/5th of the overhead effects lighting failed to illuminate during the entire hour and half performance. Hats off to Brad though. He did a tremendous job and had a well choriographed performance. The lights, videos, matted scenes of other performers was second to none. Surely these tickets were well worth the paltry price to obtain them. Brad was entertaining and engaging, even changing up and covering songs from other artists, and he did a good job at it.
 
If Brad ever happens to see this review, I would hope that he would take to heart one item that had my mind in a quandry … the montage of folks displayed across the large screen across the back of the stage during his performance of “When I get where I’m goin’”
 
I was moved by the number of people I recognized and solemnly remembered each and every one of them and how they impacted me, personally. While I didn’t know any of them personally, I did know many of them in their alter egos in music, television, politics and everyday life. Each of them in some way did have an impact on my life, each of them helped in some way to mould who I am today. I would like to think that at some point when “I get where I’m goin’” I would also be able to meet and thank each and every one of them, even for the smallest part they played in making me who I am.
 
The thing that troubled me though, was the smaller monitors across the bottom of the stage that had earlier depicted gold rings intertwined, now showed flames .. yes flames .. fire .. burning .. while I am sure there was no subliminal message, well at least I hope there wasn’t, the mass of candles burning obscured by the breaks at the monitor bezels, seemed to indicate that there was a fire buring below all of these departed souls, and at least to me the mixed messages left me in a quandry.
 
I pray that “When I get where I’m Goin’” there will be streets of gold and that times of old with fires buring would be reserved for those who hold evil in their heart.
 
So Brad, please resolve my quandry and remove the flames from this performance. Surely there is something that would depict a better place that your song surely allude to.
 
Based on this performance, I would recommend attending a Brad Paisley concert at some point in the future. 
 
Category: Music  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Friday, October 24th, 2008 | Author: KEB

You read the title correctly. Insurance is probably the biggest lie perpetuated on the public since the flat-earth crowd. Consider in the US, where the masses have been using and abusing insurance for more than a hundred years. On its face insurance looks like and sounds like a perfect solution. The cost of health care for example, is very high. One would argue that by having health insurance, you reduce your expenses, particularly in a catestrophic event, and thus reduce your overall exposure to financial risk in the process. It seems so good, how on earth could it be bad? Well, consider that insurance companies are not independently wealthy, their wealth comes from the premiums paid to them by subscribers …  like you and I, and our respective employers if we are so lucky as to have them subsidize our premiums.

 
Insurance companies are in business to make money, and as such, the premiums that must be collected from the subscribers must always be higher than the monies paid to health care providers for your care, regardless of whether it is for a $40 prescription or a $150,000 heart transplant, plus associated future medical care. It isn’t difficult to imagine then, that given the cost of health care, we just can’t afford it.

 
So, what is the answer? Well, I didn’t say I had the answer, I only said that insurance as we know it is a big lie … if the associated health care costs are not affordable, then the insurance to cover that health care, by the sheer nature of the beast, cannot be affordable either. The prospect, while pretty on the face, is unsustainable. In 2007, the average cost spent per person in the US for health care was $7600. Therefore, to make things equitable for every man, woman and child to receive benefits, (i.e. be able to go to the doctor for whatever ailment they had), a family of 4 would have had to contribute $30,400 to the insurance pool in 2007. Since it is obvious that most people can ill afford to pay the premiums under these circumstances, it stands to reason that the health insurance companies’ betting that you will not need health care is a winning one. The question then is, if the insurance companies don’t think you will need health care, or at least they don’t think the masses will need it, why have we, as a society put so much emphasis on the dire need of health care? The answer once again is with the insurance companies. The top 25 insurance companies in the US spend $1.5 billion annually telling people how much they need their product. So their job is to convice you that you NEED their product, while betting that you don’t.

 
I don’t have health insurance. It is a calculated risk I take. If the insurance company believes I don’t need their product, then why should I believe them when they tell me I do? It doesn’t mean that I forego health care … far from it. Consider that my total health care premium for 2007 would have been $15,200.00 just for me, not including my family, based on a group rate from my employer. On average that is $1267 per month for health care. I would find it very difficult to expend that amount of money monthly on my health care alone. In fact, if I went to see the doctor weekly, I would spend on average $260 per month without health insurance. Most people visit the doctor much less than that, in fact, I have been to the doctor exactly 3 times in the last 2 years. Once for a full physical, required by an organization I was working with, once for a blood test, and once for the results of those tests. I could not begin to tell you how upset I would be had I spent $30,400.00 to an insurance company to provide $295 in services. If you think health care is expensive, try looking at the true cost of your insurance. I did, and I said “No thanks”. I’ll pay for my health care costs as I incur them, and I will keep the remaining $30,000 in a savings account in case I need catestrophic care.

Category: Opine  | 7 Comments
Print Post
Friday, October 24th, 2008 | Author: markross

Well, Election Day is almost upon us. The race seems to be, once again, tightening up.
One can’t help but to wonder if there is going to be absolute chaos, as with the 2000 elections.
With all of this talk about voter fraud, It seems as though, inevitably, that this will become a real issue.
  
Mark
Category: Archive  | 5 Comments
Print Post
Thursday, October 23rd, 2008 | Author: markross

Of course, every one remembers The Wizard of Oz; as a kid, we all watched that classic movie, over and over and over again. However, has anyone really stopped and pondered some of the morals, if any, behind The Wizard of Oz?
 
I would like to share some of my insights…
 
It wasn’t until an event that took place, in my life, that left me soul searching and pondering life in a way like never before.
 
After many, many profound thoughts; one day, I had a recollection of the movie The Wizard of Oz…
Dorothy lived in this hum drum, little town in Kansas.
She dreamed of getting away, seeing something different; something new and exciting…
So, one day, she finds herself in a far out land called Oz.
 
While there, she makes three dear friends…A Scarecrow, a Tin Man and a Lion.
On their quest to find this great, powerful wizard, that they had hoped could help them, they experience many tribulations on the way. 
 
Finally, after much travel and hard work, they finally find this powerful wizard…
He spoke with a loud and mighty voice; however, to their disillusionment,
they find that this great, powerful wizard was merely another human being, hiding behind a curtain.
 
After being exposed, The Wizard tells the four friends that he will do anything that they ask, if only they do not shout at him.
The Scarecrow then asks…
What about the heart that you promised Tin Man?
And the courage that you promised Cowardly Lion?
The Tin Man and Lion ask…
And Scarecrow’s brain?
 
The Wizard reaches back, selects a diploma, presents it to the Scarecrow, then declares The scarecrow a Dr. of Thinkology.
 
The Wizard then opens a door, takes out a medal from a black bag, then presents the medal to the Lion, and declares him a a member of the Legion of Courage.
 
The Wizard then bends down, gets a heart-shaped watch from his black bag and presents it to the Tin Man.
 
Finally, the scarecrow says, Hey — what about Dorothy?
The Tin Man, yes — how about Dorothy?
And The Lion, Yeah…
 
Does anyone remember Dorothy’s reply?
Word for word, it went like this…
 
“Well, I — I think that it — that it wasn’t enough just to want to see Uncle Henry and Auntie Em — and it’s that — if I ever go looking for my heart’s desire again, I won’t look any further than my own backyard. Because if it isn’t there, I never really lost it to begin with! Is that right”? 
 
There are so many morals, and life lessons that one can take from this classic movie, however, Dorothy learned that everything that she needed, was right there, all along, in Kansas.
 
Mark
Category: Miscellaneous  | 2 Comments
Print Post
Thursday, October 23rd, 2008 | Author: KEB

Early this morning, a strangeness overcame me when I awakened briefly. I remembered a childhood occurence as clearly as it had happened yesterday. The memory came from a time when I was 6 years old and we lived in a relatively quiet neighborhood. It was a time when you could allow your children to roam the neighborhood unsupervised … I had the reign of 10 neighborhood blocks. Of course at 6 it seemed like a huge area, something now I would look at as relatively small.

I had many friends, Mike and I were neighbors … best of friends … we would meet together and along with some other friends and play all sorts of childhood games. On the particular day in question, among the 5 or 6 of us gathered on the sidewalk, we began discussions of where we would play “hide and go seek”. I didn’t want to play at my house, because at my house there were just no good places to hide because I knew them all, and at age 6, you presume everyone else must know them too! We each had a vote and I voted to play at Mike’s house, after all, he had a big dog we just loved to play with.

Being there were several other kids there, obviously there was a differing of opinions. The concensus was that we should play at Jimmy’s house. At the time, I was not really happy about that prospect, you see, Jimmy along with his brothers and sister, lived in a house much like mine, except Jimmy’s parents weren’t like mine, in fact they weren’t like anyone’s parents in the neighborhood that I knew of, this fact would ultimatley give me my first encounter with child protective services … I of course expressed my objections to playing at Jimmy’s house, because in the words of a brutally honest 6 year old, Jimmy’s house was “junky”. Sure I had been there before, heck, I had been there many times before, and let me tell you, ”junky” was expressing the living conditions mildly.

Jimmy’s house was not well kept, although the back yard was hidden by a privacy fence, it was obvious these were not the neighbors you would like to have. The front yard had several old lawn mowers in various states of disrepair a car under the carport that didn’t operate and another on the side of the house. The grass however was kept up by a cobbled together push mower used by Jimmy’s older brother Chris. This meant of course that the “junky” house just had the grass cut, nothing else. Jimmy’s youngest brother was in diapers and those diapers frequently made their way into the yard as if by magic. I find it amazing, that even at this early time, while every other struggling parent in our neighborhood was using cloth diapers, Jimmy’s brother had disposables, and they got disposed of right in the front yard along with all sorts of other personal hygene products. I don’t know if they purposefully threw them out there or if they failed to pick up after the dogs dumped the trash can, either way, they were there, the flies were plentiful, and the smell was atrocious. Inside the house was no better, doors were off the hinges, windows were broken out and the dog had messed in the floor and had not been cleaned up. I could never imagine having to live in such squalor and filth, it was certainly not a place I wished to go play.

Then, like a thief in the night, Jimmy and his siblings disappeared, they weren’t abducted though, child protective services had come in and taken the children away, from the youngest to the oldest, all were moved to foster care. Of course “we” knew where they were, even if their parents didn’t, since the parents were not allowed to have contact with the kids, and we were, we found out where they lived. A mere 5 blocks from their old place of squalor.

I don’t know what happened to Jimmy and the rest of his family and I don’t know if they ever came “home”, but I do know that Jimmy took offense to my calling his house “junky”. The rest of the kids used a little more tact than I did, they didn’t express displeasure, even though I could tell from their expressions they knew I was right. I never played “hide and go seek” that day, because even though Jimmy wasn’t a bad kid, he did have a certain amount of pride, and he just couldn’t let my comments go unanswered.

I often wonder about Jimmy and the rest of the gang, where they are and what became of their lives. The queston “Did Jimmy ever go home” likely will never be answered for me. I can only pray that he is living better now than he did then.

Category: Miscellaneous  | 3 Comments
Print Post
Tuesday, October 21st, 2008 | Author: markross

Stanley O’Neal; he is the former CEO of Merrill Lynch:
 
“with its announcement yesterday that after a loss of $2.2 billion last quarter following an $8.4 billion write-down, its former CEO Stanley O’Neal is walking away with more than $160 million”
http://www.ml.com/?id=7695_7696_8149_74412_82725_84472&ML.grp=HL
 
You can read more at:
http://www.soxfirst.com/50226711/oneals_160_million_parachute_merrill_lynchs_reward_for_failure.php
    
Mark
Print Post
Tuesday, October 21st, 2008 | Author: markross

As I am a person that has always believed in hard work and great opportunity in this country, I am now one of the many outraged citizens that is watching these large companies, not only tanking but rewarding their CEO’s with huge sums of money, while the government throws billions of tax payer dollars at these companies. Is this the reward for failure?
 
My first example is a man named Alan Fishman…
 
Washington Mutual may greatly reward him, in the amount of 19 million dollars, for 18 days of work; that’s right, 432 hours on the job.
 
All of this, while many, many home owners who had a mortgage threw Washington Mutual, are loosing their homes.
 
You can read more at:
http://www.fool.com/investing/dividends-income/2008/09/29/wamu-richly-rewards-ceo-failure.aspx
 
Please tell me, is there anything wrong here?
 
Mark
Category: Rewarding Failure  | 2 Comments
Print Post
Monday, October 20th, 2008 | Author: markross

Well, we are coming up on one year since Led Zeppelin took the stage (below) in London, at The 02 Arena, on December 10th, 2007,  for the one off show, as a tribute to Ahmet Ertegün, one of the co-founders of Atlantic Records.
 
   
 
As I am one the world’s biggest Led Zeppelin fans, I have to say, personally speaking, that it was one of the most exciting things that has happened in the last few years.
 
I still think that they far exceeded any expectations and anything that they have done (as a group) since the late, great drummer, John Bonham passed on in 1980. John Bonham’s Grave
 
This leaves me wondering, what is to come?
 
Will Led Zeppelin go for it, one more time?
  
Mark  
Print Post
Monday, October 20th, 2008 | Author: markross

Print Post
Monday, October 20th, 2008 | Author: markross

Drift into the night, silently, softly absorbing the moonlight. Pass by the stars, feel them glow;
follow him, he is inviting you. Wait inside, he’ll meet you half way; stay with him, and let go of the pain.
 
Rewind the time, reclaim those dreams; let’s sail away; to far off lands and better days. Sail through the evening, the stars are so bright, embrace the gloom as we enter the night.
 
Hold on tight, take it slow, look into his eyes, see them glow. A glimmer of light, an instance of truth; confusion aside, we can always be and dream together, in the silence of the night.
 
Copyright © 2005 Mark Ross
Category: Poetry  | Tags:  | 2 Comments
Print Post
Monday, October 20th, 2008 | Author: markross

So, you thought I was going down? Well I have a will that is strong and sound.
The leaves may wither and the leaves may fall, but in the end, the tree stands tall.
 
Copyright © 2005 Mark Ross
Category: Poetry  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Monday, October 20th, 2008 | Author: markross

I sit alone, alone by the sea, ’til only the
sea remains, and I am free.
Free from anger, free from fear;
feeling these feelings disappear.
 
Sitting and waiting, just buying time,
for there’s a better place deep in my mind.
 
Free from pain and misery, to grow new leaves
like a withered tree.
 
Copyright © 2005 Mark Litman
Category: Poetry  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment
Print Post
Sunday, October 19th, 2008 | Author: markross

In my opinion, here is a very good, case and point scenario:
 
Today, Colin Powell, a very reputable, well respected, black man and public servant to our country, endorsed Barack Obama. This may be very disheartening to some Republicans. However, as an American citizen, that is his right.
 
So, now that Colin Powell has put his personal choice out there, is it fair that people debate him on his choice and political view of how Obama may be the better leader? What will not be fair is if he is attacked on his personal life and character, in order for the other side to try to obtain some sort of headway politically. This is the kind of thing that I am seeing from the hard left. 
 
This Joe The Plumber guy simply asked a very legitimate question to Obama, while on the campaign stump; and now, he is being attacked very hard, on all different facets of his personal life.
 
So, my overall point is that if you are a public servant, then in my belief, policies and past affiliations are very fair and valid questions to ask, and to bring into question.
 
What is very hard for me to watch is the deliberate attacks on the candidate’s family and character.
I do not see how pulling a man or woman down, so viciously, with smears, will help their cause one bit; if anything it shows a desperate attempt to avoid otherwise important issues that can be, and perhaps, need to be examined.
 
This also has me wondering if some are not going to accuse Colin Powell of selecting Obama, based on race; I sure hope not.
 
Mark
Category: Archive  | 6 Comments